User talk:Axrosenthal

Welcome!

Hello, Axrosenthal!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 14:51, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Battle of Monte Castello, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not add non-existent links Knitsey (talk) 19:32, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Brazilian Expeditionary Force has been reverted.
Your edit here to Brazilian Expeditionary Force was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/1st_Bersaglieri_"Italia"_Division) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:54, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Is this an article about Waldemar Rosental or an article about the Brazilian Expeditionary Force?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Axrosenthal/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:04, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Axrosenthal! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:04, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read "What Wikipedia is not" for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a strange combo draft which fails WP:NOTMEMORIAL and WP:NOTSOAPBOX. Your explanation at the top is most assuredly not required. We do not wish for WP:OR commentary

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Axrosenthal/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 14:50, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Axrosenthal. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 15:33, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and understand the top bullet. For your convenience I will reproduce it here:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;

You are writing Draft:Waldemar Rosental about your father, as stated on my user talk page. While this is allowed in Draft space, on putative acceptance you are firmly advised not to edit it further.

Your COI blinds you to our rules about facts verified by citations which pass WP:42. Your father has not been demonstrated to be notable. Very few 1st lieutenants are notable.

We have Brazilian Expeditionary Force as an article. Your time would be better served by adding cited facts to that article. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 17:28, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Waldemar Rosental (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Brazilian Expeditionary Force. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

But I suggest you omit your father unless his actions were truly notable

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Waldemar Rosental and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 17:35, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Waldemar Rosental has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Waldemar Rosental. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:55, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Timtrent. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 19:25, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please accept my apology if it was taken as an attack. I am stressing the fact that what is perceived to be noteworthy depends totally on the understanding of the whole context and not an isolated run of the mill as mentioned. The lack of understanding of the meaning of being a Jew soldier deployed to Italy and receiving a military medal for bravery by the same president that was fixing to join Germany being run of the mill is very disrespectful but I did not raised the tone of voice. Y'all are looking with such a narrow lenses that considers a female porn actress noteworthy but cannot understand from a Jewish viewpoint how noteworthy my article is. I raised the question if this is plain antisemitism or porn actresses are more noteworthy than Jewish soldiers from 1940's Brazil. If porn actresses are indeed noteworthy I definitely think Wikipedia has lost its seriousness. Axrosenthal (talk) 19:53, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We base articles on what reliable, published independent sources say about a topic, your draft has zero verifiable sources, so there is zero indication of any notabilty. Theroadislong (talk) 20:18, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The book reference citing him directly with a brief description of his duties is presented, albeit ignored per your last statement. Axrosenthal (talk) 20:24, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That would not be sufficient to establish notability on it's own. Theroadislong (talk) 21:08, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~That is not acceptable. If oyu are going to apologise then do it to me, on my user talk page. I will not accept it here.~~ 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 20:58, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No longer interested except by resolution at ANI. See notice below. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 22:06, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your disgraceful attack has led to this report.

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Accusation of antisemitism by Axrosenthal. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 21:59, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Waldemar Rosental (July 31)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: subject is not mentioned in any of the sources.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:03, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]