User talk:Asho123456

This is Asho123456's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Asho123456/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wiae /tlk 15:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Asho123456, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wiae /tlk 15:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Asho123456/sandbox

Hello, Asho123456. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 20:59, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

American Whig–Cliosophic Society

Hi Asho123456

Please don't revert reference improvements, as you did at American Whig–Cliosophic Society. Thanks. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:08, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I will include well-sourced points Asho123456 (talk) 14:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced POV commentary.

See WP:NPOV and WP:RS and WP:V. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:18, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is also sourced. I think it is not fair to the true to hide material Asho123456 (talk) 15:32, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion concerning you

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is POV-pushing by Asho123456. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:36, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am only pulling from publicly available information. I don't think the page should be hiding information that is available. Asho123456 (talk) 00:32, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You have been indefinitely blocked from one article, American Whig–Cliosophic Society for disruptive editing. You can edit other pages including making well-referenced edit requests at Talk: American Whig–Cliosophic Society. Please read the Guide to appealing blocks. Cullen328 (talk) 04:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Asho123456 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here: I simply put publicly available information about the American Whig-Cliosophic Society on the page. The information is not flattering of the society, so I assume that is why somebody blocked me Asho123456 (talk) 19:39, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That information is public is insufficient for article content, especially if you clearly have an agenda. You have been blocked for POV pushing and disruption. You are welcome to make edit requests(click for instructions) on the article talk page, in order to collaborate and establish a consensus. 331dot (talk) 19:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leora Batnitzky (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While the subject may well meet notability guidelines (WP:NPROF), the article needs to be rewritten to be an encyclopedic article, not a resume, and it needs secondary sources, not a link to a faculty page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leora Batnitzky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 04:30, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leora Batnitzky has been accepted

Leora Batnitzky, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 06:48, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Batnitzky wiki pic.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Batnitzky wiki pic.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Ирука¹³ 20:33, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]