User talk:Amitunbind

October 2023

Hello, I'm GMH Melbourne. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to ESIM have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. ––– GMH MELBOURNE 14:19, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spammy links as sources

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Clear aligners. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:25, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saral Home (April 20)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Jeraxmoira was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amitunbind! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello Amitunbind. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Saral Home, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Amitunbind. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Amitunbind|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jeraxmoira, I am not getting paid from Saral Home directly or indirectly. I am from New Delhi and last month my wife had ordered bedsheets and rugs from this company. Last week i saw them in my bedroom and then i wanted to know more about this brand and googled it. I saw their website. I liked it too. Later when i was using wikipedia, i wondered whether this brand is available on wikipedia, i tried searching and i didn't found so i though of create a page for this brand. I was aware of its website so i added the its website address. if you feel that its against the Wikipedia norms then please let me know and i will remove them. It was just a fair trial i did to create a page as it was my first attempt to create a page on wikipedia. please let me know your thoughts. Thanks in Advance. Amitunbind (talk) 08:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article about Saral Home is not notable as it does not have enough coverage. You would be better off improving the existing articles on Wikipedia. The Suggested edits section on Special:Homepage will be a good place to start. Cheers Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh ok, i will be keep on doing suggested edits and will create an article only when i find notable enough. Thank you. Amitunbind (talk) 08:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Saral Home

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Saral Home, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:13, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Clove Dental

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Clove Dental, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 13:51, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advert warning - final warning

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Deb (talk) 14:17, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you wish to recreate Clove Dental, I suggest you to provide reliable sources, and look at the previous discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clove Dental. Also, while you claim to have removed all the advertising content as per my belief, unsourced lists of possibly non-notable awards are still considered promotional. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:49, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

I have blocked you for one month for disruptive editing. Please be more careful when your block ends. Deb (talk) 15:25, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amitunbind (talk) 08:16, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whistle (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by ToThAc were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Whistle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ToThAc (talk) 21:30, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok, thank you @ToThAc for addressing the issue. I will fix the problems you have mentioned and then ask you to take a look again before actually resubmitting it for review. i hope you will help me. Amitunbind (talk) 21:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Whistle has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Whistle. Thanks! ToThAc (talk) 22:00, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Highly Grateful that you replied.

I have deleted those paragraphs related to clear aligner and dental crowns as you pointed out. I was searching for references online but did not found anymore. All i found is these urls listing down here in case you wish to check:

https://www.wkindia.com/work/whistle-invisible-aligners/

https://www.afaqs.com/news/advertising/whistle-launches-mute-films

https://www.campaignindia.in/article/campaign-india-film-crest-awards-2024-shortlists-and-jury-announced/495804

https://www.medianews4u.com/whistle-quirkily-plays-up-confidence-that-comes-with-perfect-teeth-pitches-invisible-aligners/

https://www.financialexpress.com/business/healthcare-we-will-continue-to-scale-our-clinic-network-and-raise-awareness-among-consumers-amarinder-singh-founder-ceo-clove-dental-3446282/

Please let me know if it is good to be submitted or still has some issues that you can help me giving directions to correct. Amitunbind (talk) 22:17, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @ToThAc just wondering have you saw my last message. I was looking for more reliable sources but on google and found these:

whistle was previously known as Love My Smile
This was registered on Crunchbase, url: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/lovemysmile I visited this url and found the link present under About section is www.lovemysmile.com which is redirecting to https://whistle.in/
On this page i have found Amarinder Singh as Chief Executive Officer and Owner

Now please help and suggest me if i should add this information to the current draft or not. Do you think that it is a valuable information and follows the wikipedia guidelines? Please suggest. Amitunbind (talk) 07:42, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discount the Campaign India source (third one on the list), as that's just a passing mention. As for the others, I'll be happy to discuss them at RSN. ToThAc (talk) 17:00, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ToThAc ok i have removed the third one campaign india source from references section of this article.

https://www.wkindia.com/work/whistle-invisible-aligners/ -- this one i found on Wieden+Kennedy India website which is a famous American Ad agency whose wikipedia page is already present.

https://www.afaqs.com/news/advertising/whistle-launches-mute-films -- this was the campaign that W+K did for Whistle in Dec 2023. I have also seen the video on youtube so i assumed that it is legit.

https://www.medianews4u.com/whistle-quirkily-plays-up-confidence-that-comes-with-perfect-teeth-pitches-invisible-aligners/ -- This i believe is a pr and its also covering that W+K ad campaign that i mentioned.

https://www.financialexpress.com/business/healthcare-we-will-continue-to-scale-our-clinic-network-and-raise-awareness-among-consumers-amarinder-singh-founder-ceo-clove-dental-3446282/ -- Here the CEO of the company Amarinder singh has mentioned about oral health, some health related facts. While reading this content i found about the mention of Whistle as a answer to this question "In recent times there has been also an increase in the D2C market of Dental products. How Clove is looking at them as a competitor or as a market?" I believe financialexpress.com is a famous website with legit value and can be consider as reliable source.

Apart from this i had also mentioned 3 more points, i am repeating it again (just in case you wish to address them too):

whistle was previously known as Love My Smile
This was registered on Crunchbase, url: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/lovemysmile I visited this url and found the link present under About section is www.lovemysmile.com which is redirecting to https://whistle.in/
On this page i have found Amarinder Singh as Chief Executive Officer and Owner

I know i am taking your valuable time on this and i really hope you will help me, am thankful for your responses. Please guide me here. Thanks. Amitunbind (talk) 17:53, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @ToThAc, i have revised the Draft here Draft:Whistle, can you please check and share your feedback here in my talk page, please. Amitunbind (talk) 18:48, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hi @ToThAc i have been waiting on this nearly two months now, by any chance if you have a few mins, can you please recheck the draft i created and let me know if i should resubmit it. Amitunbind (talk) 05:43, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Whistle

Hello, Amitunbind. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Whistle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whistle (Brand) (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Whistle (Brand) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 09:57, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @KylieTastic for giving me your valuable feedback, i will do some more research and if i find something more valuable, i will add on it and let you know for review before submitting it again. Amitunbind (talk) 11:44, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tilapta Karanwas has been accepted

Tilapta Karanwas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—Matrix(!) _{ping one}^{when replying} {u - t? - _uselessc} 15:17, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Matrix, Thanks a ton for making the page live and explaining about the Page Grade. I am so happy today as its my first live article at Wikipedia. your kind words made me feel more motivated and i will surely keep doing the quality contributions. Amitunbind (talk) 10:33, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vimal Arora (October 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AlphaBetaGamma were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Relies way too much on primary source in my opinion. Missing citations and overexaggerated award counts are a red flag. Please only list the most important roles, with those that have/warrant a wikipedia article preferred

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vimal Arora and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 14:04, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

Hello, I'm Khagendrawiki. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Draft:Vimal Arora have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Do no remove declined tag from draft. Khagendra (talk) 08:25, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Khagendrawiki I was still working on it and did not submitted it for approval. If possible, please reverse to my recent contributions so that i can proceed further. Amitunbind (talk) 08:53, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hi @Amitunbind the draft is currently not submitted (after 1st decline) , you may work on your draft (and consider taking reviewer's advice) and whenever you feel you are ready to submit your draft for review you can simply click on blue "Resubmit" button on the left bottom side of the Draft just above the comment section. just to reassure you draft is currently not submitted for review . Khagendra (talk) 09:03, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick reply @Khagendrawiki, I have added lot of information available on different websites and online sources but most of them are not as strong as wikipedia requires, i felt that i should shorten the content and remove anything that may not fulfills Wikipedia guidelines and i cannot strongly cite from proper website as mentioned by @AlphaBetaGamma. I am trying to only keep those information that can be strongly cited. Hope you understand. Also can you please suggest me a good reviewer if you can. Amitunbind (talk) 09:18, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vimal Arora has been accepted

Vimal Arora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Standgusto (talk) 12:25, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vimal Arora (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NeoGaze was:

Subject seems notable, but there are too many instances of the source not supporting what is stated (failed verification) or statements that have no citations (citation needed). Please fix these issues before resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vimal Arora and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NeoGaze (talk) 15:46, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @NeoGaze, i have gone through the instructions given by you and edited the article accordingly now, removed/edited any sentence that does have either failed verification or citation needed. I request you to please check once and let me know before i re-submit it.

Regards Amitunbind (talk) 07:23, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, the early life section need a reference to support what is claime, but otherwise the rest of the draft seems fine. NeoGaze (talk) 17:29, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I tried finding the same and i got this https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-vimal-arora/ linkedin profile of the vimal arora where he has mentioned about the education, shall i use this link as reference? Amitunbind (talk) 05:05, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@NeoGaze another reference i found for the same is here https://theorg.com/org/clove-dental/org-chart/lt-gen-dr-vimal-arora-pvsm-avsm-vsm-and-bar will this work? Amitunbind (talk) 05:07, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The second one is better, linkeding counts as social media, which is user-generated content that shouldn't be used as a reference. NeoGaze (talk) 17:38, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok @NeoGaze, then i am adding the second one as reference and re-submitting it now, expecting your support here to make this article live.

Thanks in Advance :) Amitunbind (talk) 06:14, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@NeoGaze: I would have thought the first source is better, per WP:BLPSELFPUB. The second source features a "join to edit" button if you click the ..., suggesting it is user generated. Thoughts? —Matrix _{ping me}^{when u reply} (t? - c) 12:08, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, I wasn't aware of that rule. Then the first seems to be more appropiate one for this case. NeoGaze (talk) 14:51, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright @NeoGaze & @Matrix, I have updated the Draft:Vimal Arora the reference with the linkedin one. Please review. Thank you. Amitunbind (talk) 16:16, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will let another editor take a look at it, which should be fairly soon since we are currently in a backlog drive. It probably will get accepted, just be patient. NeoGaze (talk) 19:32, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @NeoGaze,

patiently and eagerly waiting to see this one live :)

Regards, Amitunbind (talk) 09:52, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vimal Arora (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Htanaungg was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

LinkedIn and YouTube should not be used for referencing--please find reliable secondary sources only.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vimal Arora and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Htanaungg (talk) 09:59, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Htanaungg, I have removed both Linkedin and YouTube References as well as removed the "Early life and education" section completely due to lack of reliable sources as per wikipedia policies, requesting you to review again. Regards, Amitunbind (talk) 11:45, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vimal Arora (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Somepinkdude were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The lists, overuse of bold, and unrelated references seem to suggest that AI was used.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vimal Arora and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Somepinkdude (talk) 21:19, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vimal Arora has been accepted

Vimal Arora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—Matrix _{ping me}^{when u reply} (t? - c) 11:44, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Whistle (Brand)

Hello, Amitunbind. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Whistle (Brand), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:11, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Amitunbind. Thank you for your work on Vimal Arora. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this article for a Director General of Dental Services in the Armed Forces Medical Services, who reaches WP:NBIO primarily through his work in this role. It would now be helpful to link this page from other, also checking some of the existing links (I wonder whether he is involved in football management!).

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 04:17, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]