User talk:Amadavadi

Nomination of Chitrak Shah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chitrak Shah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chitrak Shah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Steve Quinn (talk) 09:32, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Contract lifecycle management. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] GermanJoe (talk) 15:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Takhteshwar Temple moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Takhteshwar Temple. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Bahuchar Mata Temple, Becharaji

Hello! Your submission of Bahuchar Mata Temple, Becharaji at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Sohom (talk) 15:04, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update the Citation issue and sharing one more link for verification which is from a leading Indian news paper Driving through the queer legends of Bahucharaji | Ahmedabad News - Times of India (indiatimes.com) Amadavadi (talk) 10:33, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Sohom Datta ! Any heads up on this? does anyone else voted for this? This is my first submission for DYK. Amadavadi (talk) 09:28, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody else needs to look at it since I made some changes to the hook. Sohom (talk) 10:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Bahuchar Mata Temple, Becharaji

Hello! Your submission of Bahuchar Mata Temple, Becharaji at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 23:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Did you use any kind of AI to generate this response ? Using AI to reply to people in conversations (without checking and understanding it's output) can be considered disruptive, so if you are using AI on wikipedia, I would suggest that you immediately stop doing that. Sohom (talk) 13:12, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Takhteshwar Temple

Hello, Amadavadi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Takhteshwar Temple, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:08, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting children name from Ashok Mittal

Hi

I have reverted the addition of children name from Ashok Mittal infobox.

In case you find it to be a mistake, please add it back if you have sufficient proof of his/her being notable as per Infobox Parameters (parameter -children).

Regards — Awsib (talk) 19:31, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

The guideline says:

Typically the number of children (e.g., 3); only list names of independently notable or particularly relevant children. Names may be preceded by a number to show total children and avoid implying that named children are the only offspring. For privacy reasons, consider omitting the names of living children, unless notable.

To give you an example if you notice, even articles like Raveena Tandon does not have her daughter's name mentioned though her daughter's name is well known. Gautam Adani article is also a good example.

Names appearing in some news story doesn't make them notable.Please note children should be notable.

Wikipedia should not be a platform to provide free publicity to children. Also security,privacy etc should be considered. It doesn't help the reader in any way to know names of children if they are not notable.Please refer Wikipedia:Notability (people).

Thanks

— Awsib (talk) 17:01, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Awsib ,

This is a great point! I was thinking that I was contributing for a good cause, but this is another valuable perspective. I will keep this in mind for my future contributions as well.

Appreciate your guidance! Amadavadi (talk) 05:01, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jio Coin moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jio Coin. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and in particular, reliable independent sources with significant coverage not just speculation and rumour. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. SunloungerFrog (talk) 15:59, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]