User talk:Abdemo0912/sandbox

Mihailooo02 (talk) 19:51, 19 November 2020 (UTC)This is a nice opening statement and a nice first sentence. I think it leads well into the article. However, you have not written anything else. As a peer-reviewer, I would suggest that your next step be going over your sources, identifying the information that you want to contribute and that follows the plan that you have outlined in your proposal, and that you go ahead and do it. That is the main point of my peer review. The one sentence that you have looks nice, but other than that, I strongly suggest that you contribute more to your target article.

-Mihailo

Potenital articles: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Myth_of_Mars_and_Venus Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes it relates to psychology of gender. Is it written neutrally? Yes it is written neutrally, except for on portion where the editor fails to mention that the author does state that there exists differences in linguistic expression. Does each claim have a citation? Yes each claim includes a citation, but there are very few claims included in the article. Are the citations reliable? Yes the citations work and are reliable. Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? Yes, the article covers gender differences.