User talk:190.22.221.31

June 2025

Hello, I'm ExplorerofSpace. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Martin Kulldorff have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. That was not vandalism. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 01:59, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you send me an automatic message and reverted the edit, but didn't provide any source or argument to mantain the old version, don't abuse your position as registered account and return the new version or argument why you would sustain the old. 190.22.221.31 (talk) 02:03, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not delete or alter legitimate talk page comments from other editors, as you did at User talk:190.22.221.31. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 🪷 nahida 02:09, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody is trying to hide your comments. However, do not modify the meaning of other people's comments by adding something to them they did not say. Said edits will be reverted. 🪷 nahida 02:12, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, another (Personal attack removed) bot (controlled by a person), don't vandalism my OWN talk, you really make this page worst putting your own opinions above main sources and statements of the persons inself.

"However, do not modify the meaning of other people's" Really? The comment I edit is clearly a BOT response, stop abusing your power as registered account, and if your wanna make edits or return edits, argument it. 190.22.221.31 (talk) 02:16, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We aren't vandalizing your talk page. Explorer is a person and noticed something wrong with one of your edits, so you were warned. Nobody is abusing any power here. You aren't allowed to change the meaning of someone else's comment(s).🪷 nahida 02:25, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Explorer is a person" Yes, clearly this reponse is writed by a person "one or more of your recent contributions", I only make ONE change, clearly you and the other "admins" create bots and make edits even when your didn't read the changes, only because I'm an unregistered account, and acuse me of vandalism.

Again: Stop abusing your power as registered account, and if your wanna make edits or return edits, argument it. 190.22.221.31 (talk) 02:29, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These are semi-automated warning templates so that warnings are consistent and simple. Repeatedly accusing other people of vandalism without evidence can be construed as a personal attack. Not going to go back and forth, so just keep this in mind. 🪷 nahida 02:33, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect, you and the other ~~bots~~ registered accounts keep in mind: if you wanna make edits or return edits, argument it. 190.22.221.31 (talk) 02:36, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Martin Kulldorff shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 🪷 nahida 02:44, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You ~~and your script~~ again? I'm not going to open a talk page for some editing. If you want to keep the arguments from the previous page, please explain why when you reverted. And don't contribute to the abuse against unregistered editors. 190.22.221.31 (talk) 02:50, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:190.22.221.31 reported by User:Bon courage (Result: ). Thank you. Bon courage (talk) 03:03, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LMAO, you returns my edits, didn't give any argument WHY, accuse me of vandalism and now I'm reported to the other "admins".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YoVwFrsU-hQ 190.22.221.31 (talk) 03:07, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I opened a discussion on Talk:Martin Kulldorff about your recent edits.

Please discuss your proposed changes there. GeogSage ^{(⚔Chat?⚔)} 03:08, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Amakuru (talk) 14:16, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.