This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from all of Wikipedia.
"Please log in before messaging"
Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles, as you did to Wikipedia:Sandbox. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. yeah you can get in trouble for editing improperly on SandboxRgoodermote 02:44, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
The talk page is for communication with you, basically I post a message here you get the message. This is not your sandbox, but your user page can be used as a sandbox. Rgoodermote 02:45, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. — alex.muller (talk • edits) 14:04, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you and no I do not hold the record, I used to know it but I forgot. I need to ask you a favor mate, I need you to start editing on the mainspace. You have been editing only in userspace and on the sandbox. You could get in trouble if you do not start editing articles. Find a niche and then start branching out. Rgoodermote 21:06, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 04:49, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Please do not edit the user and user-talk pages of other users by redirecting them to your own. Also, do not use other users' pages for any other type of practice-editing or work-in-progress writing. DMacks (talk) 08:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 13:42, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with MorparScape. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 13:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Deleted because the article did not assert that this web content has been recognized as notable, see WP:WEB. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:54, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — alex.muller (talk • edits) 00:52, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
I deleted the article MorparScape because it didn't become clear from the article how and why the subject was notable. Such articles can be speedy deleted per speedy deletion criterion A7. The notability criteria for web content are outlined in WP:WEB. Simply existing is not enough. If you can write a new article demonstrating how and why the subject is notable, you can be bold and do so. But I strongly recommend you read WP:N and WP:WEB before you start. If you disagree with the deletion, you can also request a deletion review. If you need help with this, you can leave a message on my user talk page and I'll help you out. AecisBrievenbus 01:08, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Common procedure in such cases, when you think the article is ready to be moved back into the encyclopedia, is to request a deletion review, to ask for permission to move it back into the encyclopedia. As I said above, if you need help with that, you can leave me a message and I'll help you out. If you have any questions about Wikipedia in general, you can obviously leave me a message as well. AecisBrievenbus 01:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to MoRpArScApE, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 02:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
You did not "find" it, you created it. That article (note the spelling) was highly inappropriate. Wikipedia admins do not "block other people" because you ask us to. We follow carefully laid out rules that are there to protect the integrity of Wikipedia. If you continue to create articles like MoRpArScApE, you will be blocked from editing here. Gwernol 02:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:38, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Wikipedia/Sandbox, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thinboy00 @155, i.e. 02:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Your article is was inappropriate for Wikipedia; please read our core policies on verifiability and maintaining a neutral point of view. You article contains multiple breaches of these policies. Please do not move it into article space. Gwernol 02:46, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
I agree with Aecis. You can't base Wikipedia articles on what you know -- they have to rely on independent sources. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
An editor has nominated Summaries for The Black Pearl, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Please do not try to move your talk page again. In doing so you lost several important messages and seriously messed up the edit history, which we are legally required to maintain. Thanks, Gwernol 01:53, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Castle wars 2.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Black Pearl. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 13:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Are you aware of the fact that we have an article about minerals? If you wish to improve the article, you can be bold and do so. If you're not sure whether what you have in mind is an improvement, you can propose it on the article's talk page, at Talk:Mineral. AecisBrievenbus 20:58, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Minerals is indeed a redirect to mineral, yes. But what would be the difference between what you have described in your sandbox and what is described in the article mineral? AecisBrievenbus 21:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
I see that you have created a new article at Minerals. I have reverted it and restored the redirect to Mineral. We can't have two articles about essentially the same subject. If you think the article Mineral should be rewritten, you can propose this on the article's talk page Talk:Mineral. But if you want to write an article for people who don't know English very well, how about the Simple English Wikipedia, at simple:Mineral? AecisBrievenbus 21:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
