Jump to content

User:Djsasso/tools

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
...from administrators 2
Requests for unblock 96
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 5
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 42
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 6
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 2
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 101
Requested RD1 redactions 13
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 30
Open sockpuppet investigations 87
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

[edit]
All Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons
Copy to Wikimedia Commons with hidden file revisions
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review
Requested RD1 redactions
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons as of unknown date
Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Copyright problems
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion no drafts
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion no portals
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion no user pages
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Template editor
User talk:XLinkBot/RevertList
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion
Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge

WP:AIV

Reports

[edit]

Bot-reported

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]

CSD / PRODs

[edit]
Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 0
Hoaxes 0
Vandalism 0
User requested 0
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 14
Importance or significance not asserted 5
Possibly contested candidates 4
Other candidates 11
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

This box:
Wikipedia files with unknown source – 1-day backlog (oldest)
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – 1-day backlog (oldest)
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 3 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 337 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 277 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 13 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

[edit]
Usernames for administrator attention


Bot-reported

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Isabella DeLuca

[edit]

Reason: Falls under Wikipedia:Contentious topics/American politics, facing changes against consensus from IP editor that has a larger range than can be easily blocked (?). Temporary semi-protection ideal -- Reconrabbit 16:25, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just two edits, easily reverted. Daniel Case (talk) 19:04, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

List of American films of 1978

[edit]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 17:14, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2600:8806:9192:6D00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by NinjaRobotPirate. For a year. Daniel Case (talk) 19:05, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Ben Shimoni

[edit]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Entranced98 (talk) 20:09, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Done Ad Orientem (talk) 23:49, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
information Administrator note @Entranced98 The article is almost completely unreferenced. That is unacceptable, especially given its controversial claims. This needs to be corrected PDQ or it is going to end up being merged, stubbed or deleted. As of right now there is no clear evidence that it meets our notability guidelines. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:49, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

List of supercentenarians by continent

[edit]

Reason: This page was recently temporarily protected due to frequent IP vandalism, generally random changing of birth and death dates. Since the protection was lifted the page has again been frequently targeted by the same vandal. Mark and inwardly digest (talk) 20:12, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:56, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

John MacArthur (American pastor)

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs adding he should burn in hell: here, here, and here. Maybe a month or so protection might do. S0091 (talk) 20:35, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:58, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Coalition of the willing (Russo-Ukrainian War)

[edit]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:RUSUKR. — 🪫Volatile 📲T | ⌨️C 20:43, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Done Ad Orientem (talk) 23:59, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Ethiopian Jews in Israel

[edit]

Reason: WP:ARBPIA

In relation to other articles of a similar nature, (Israeli Arab-conflict etc) I think the protection of this article has to be increased as a result of the decisions in the arbitration about those articles.

It seems to me that the kind of propagandising relevant to those articles also risks this article. I would like to add that I personally think the degree of protection for this category is excessive in many cases and I hope this page will only be semi-protected. Slomo666 (talk) 21:24, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Death of Aristotelis Goumas

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: IPv6 edit warring. tony 22:16, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Brian Wilson

[edit]

Reason: IP editor continuously adding hyperbolic, pointless, and/or unsourced material since 5 July. Insists on changing phrases like "one of the most significant musical figures of his era" to "all time".

  • 5 July - changed to "widely regarded as one of the most significant songwriters and record producers of all time"
  • 8 July - changed to "widely regarded as one of the most significant songwriters and producers of all time and a foundational influence on modern popular music" (source was falsely attributed to the New York Times)
  • 8 July - changed "one of the most innovative and significant songwriters and producers'"
  • 9 July - changed "considered him to be one of the most significant songwriters and composers"
  • 10 July - modified the phrase "late 20th century" to "20th century" (the 2016 source is referring more specifically to "the last half-century")\
  • 12 July - same as 5 June, also modified the phrase "branded a genius in the 1960s" to "known as a genius since the 1960s"
  • 13 July - now "recognized culturally as a genius", whatever that means
  • 14 July - changed to "one of the most innovative and significant musical figures of the 20th century"
  • 16 July - added original research to the article body; this time lead was changed to "one of the most innovative and significant figures in the history of popular music, as well as one of the greatest composers of the 20th century."
  • 18 July - unsourced claim (Bernstein has never referenced Wilson on record)
  • 21 July - changed to "one of the most influential, innovative and significant musical figures of the 20th century" ili (talk) 23:08, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Battle of Altun Kupri (2017)

[edit]

Reason: Misinformation and constant edit, wars, and vandalism 46.153.195.194 (talk) 23:25, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Shortcuts

Mini (marque)

[edit]

Reason: It has been years since it has been protected, low risk of vandalism now. ExoNeos (talk) 16:13, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Avatar (2009 film)

[edit]

Reason: More than 10 years of protection with little vandalism or disruption. ExoNeos (talk) 01:14, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) There has, however, been a long history of vandalism prior to the protection, so it could very well be serving its purpose to this day. If we do test the waters with WP:TRYUNPROT, it's probably worth downgrading to PC. Entranced98 (talk) 15:31, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Transformers

[edit]

Reason: More than 10 years of protection with little vandalism or disruption. ExoNeos (talk) 01:49, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Sounds like it's working? It doesn't seem like the talk page is bogged down by edit requests either. Sergecross73 msg me 14:41, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Super Smash Bros. for Nintendo 3DS and Wii U

[edit]

Reason: Game is largely forgotten now, no need for pending changes anymore. ExoNeos (talk) 02:43, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

King Arthur

[edit]

Reason: More than 10 years of little vandalism or distruption.

(Non-administrator comment) There has, however, been a long history of vandalism prior to the protection, so it could very well be serving its purpose to this day. If we do test the waters with WP:TRYUNPROT, it's probably worth downgrading to PC.2001:8003:164F:6800:B9FB:41DB:F6D:4ED1 (talk) 22:07, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


Handled requests

[edit]

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

2 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Main other (request) 2025-07-20 04:44 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Picture of the day/On the main pages (log) Protected by Anomie on 2019-07-11: "Cascade-protecting to mirror Main page cascade protection to cover all options of multiple-picture POTDs, per discussion at WT:POTD#Use of Module:Random may be problematic"
MediaWiki:Bad image list (request) 2025-07-21 09:21 MediaWiki page (log) Protected by Redwolf24 on 2005-10-23: "Like all pages in the MediaWiki: space"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:29, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
6 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox tennis tournament year (request) 2025-06-23 18:52 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Archives (request) 2025-07-01 00:54 Template-protected (log) Modified by Fuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors"
Template:ODNBsub (request) 2025-07-13 21:49 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox college sports team season (request) 2025-07-15 06:11 Template-protected (log) From Template:Infobox NCAA team season: Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Designation (request) 2025-07-17 00:04 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Infobox website (request) 2025-07-21 18:22 Template-protected (log) Modified by KrakatoaKatie on 2016-10-13: "Highly visible template: RFPP request withdrawn"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:24, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Yoblyblob

[edit]

Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Also wanted to mention that if I am unsure of a subject's notability, I will utilize WP:AFC for my own articles occasionally Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 02:20, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Came here to request this permission for a different user, but since Yoblyblob is referencing their WP:MAY25 NPP work, it is worth noting that among the re-reviews of each patroller's work, 14/17 of their patrol decisions were approved. Of the remainder, two were drafted/redirected as WP:TOOSOON coverage of 2026 state elections and one was drafted for lacking enough coverage to qualify under WP:NEVENT. Considering they were the fifth most active patroller of the drive, this accuracy is good, not great. ViridianPenguin🐧 (💬) 19:20, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Etzedek24

[edit]

7-year vet of the site, multiple GANs and DYKs, 51 mainspace articles created of which 49 are live (G6 and G7 deletions for the other two). Etzedek24 (Talk) (Contribs) 20:54, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

User:PickleG13

[edit]

I have been on Wikipedia for more than a decade, and I truly feel that it is one of my great passions in life. I have more than 30,000 edits, and I am credited with more than 300 articles that are not Redirects or Disambiguation pages. (I personally take credit for more than 100 of these, which did not originate as Redirect pages.) Although I continue to propose Draft pages to this day when I am not 100% confident myself about notability, I frequently go straight to the mainspace and have made a number of articles that have been significant in some form or field, with my particular focus being on film industry and electoral politics pages.

Recently, I redirected a few thousand Supreme Court of the United States cases to the case volumes in which they were listed. It was a large-scale project for me, but in the end it was decided that redlinks would be better for promoting caseload knowledge, something that I agreed to and I believe will continue to service our Wikipedia community. For this reason, it might appear that I have a large number of deleted pages, but this is almost exclusively due to this particular project; I had an edit deletion rate of less than 2%, and I had not had a page that I created taken down in years, not since I was a far more novice editor. (You can read more about that SCOTUS discussion here.)

I believe that being autopatrolled will continue to allow me to contribute to the Wikipedia community, and that is why I am reaching out to ask for permissions. I am happy to answer any questions or improve any articles that I have created if there is anything noticeable that needs help. Although I have long been looking to increase my permissions and role in the community, I quite frankly have always had impostor syndrome stop me from asking, but a bit of encouragement from Liz made me try. Thank you so much! PickleG13 (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

I'm not inclined to grant autopatrolled so soon after the SCOTUS redirect deletions, but won't object if another admin wants to grant it. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:51, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for your honest feedback, voorts. Although I hope that an admin decides to grant it, I have been on Wikipedia for a long time and I will continue to for a long time to come no matter what. Please let me know if you ever need help with anything, whether it's a full-scale project or a simple clean-up. PickleG13 (talk) 21:47, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

User:CherryPie94

[edit]

I was granted a two month trial for this. Have created 100+ articles with 10K+ edits and will continue to do so. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 23:19, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Dr vulpes (expires 00:00, 15 July 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 23:20, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

User:ArtemisiaGentileschiFan

[edit]

Regular article creator and Did you know? contributor who demonstrates understanding of the notability guidelines on a number of topics. No copyright violation troubles, and spot-checks for text–source integrity do indeed check out. Note their creation Not-deer was deleted at AfD earlier this year; I'm not inclined to give this too much weight here as it seems to have been a notability edge case, and experienced participants in that discussion gave reasonable arguments both for and against deletion. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:08, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Lanceloth345

[edit]

I have created over 25 new articles that meet notability guidelines and follow Wikipedia standards and guideliness. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s core content policies (NPOV, V, NOR) and believe that being autopatrolled will reduce the workload on new page patrollers. Thank you in advance Lanceloth345 (talk) 12:43, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Hey Lanceloth345, could you comment on why Petrit Malaj was deleted a few weeks ago, and what you improved when you recreated it? (Courtesy ping for Sphilbrick, who deleted under CSD G12.) Similarlly with Gjesti, which is currently in draftspace. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 13:08, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Page Petrit Malaj was recreated again in neutral way + more sources, becouse first version had some words "sounding" not neutral at all, (my fault) as per draft:Gjesti lacking notability it's under review but explained at talk page of draft page reasons why he is notable ect. (also partecipating other editor in discussion). Lanceloth345 (talk) 13:13, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

User:JesusisGreat7

[edit]

I've created 117 articles so far, all of which are live. I mostly write on topics related to history, architecture, and caves. Thanks for considering my request. Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 08:56, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

 Not done, a spot check through recent creations shows many edits from NPP, including removing unreliable sources. -- asilvering (talk) 00:38, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Tzim78

[edit]
Met this user at today's Event:NYC 400 Wiknic and Edit-A-Thon with Washington Square Park, and he lamented the delay in getting his articles patrolled despite being a prolific article writer. After reviewing their work, granting the autopatrolled right would be well-deserved. Three of their article creations from 2012 were deleted as non-notable malls. His 2014 creation of Ancient Theatre of Mytilene was deleted within days under WP:G12 which is not good but also more than a decade ago. Since then, he has written 221 live articles, 100 of which are C-class, across subjects including companies, biographies, and art pieces with adherence to our notability guidelines. ViridianPenguin🐧 (💬) 19:39, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:Dahawk04

[edit]

I have create multiple articles which are rated well and want to tool to simplify editing and maintaining them and other articles. Dahawk04 Talk 💬 16:37, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

@Dahawk04: how does access to AWB help with their maintenance? And could you please ensure your signature meets accessibility criteria set out in WP:SIGAPP; the green+white is too difficult to read. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 10:37, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

User:ImaginesTigers

[edit]

I am a serial offender of doubling up words and would like to save others the trouble. See my user page for my history of content creation. Thank you. — ImaginesTigers (talk) 11:26, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

 Done. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 10:39, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Absolutiva

[edit]

I would like to fix typos and other maintenance using User:Joeytje50/JWB. Absolutiva 13:32, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

 Not done Given you were recently warned on your talk page for inappropriate use of automated tools (Special:PermaLink/1297453681#Stop_removing_links_to_cities) I don't think it's prudent to grant you access to additional automated tools. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:02, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
It is recently discussed at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Linking#OVERLINK vs GEOLINK, I need a consensus for this. Absolutiva 22:55, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag.

Extended confirmed

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for event coordinator

Event coordinator

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Gnoeee

[edit]

Hi. I'm a member and event Organizer of Wikimedians of Kerala UG. As part of outreach activities I actively engage in organizing events to raise awareness about Wikimedia projects. While I often rely on my admin rights on Wikidata and the Outreach Dashboard to manage these events, I believe having the Event Coordinator right here would enable me to more effectively support event and coordination efforts.- ❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 07:55, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

 Already done (automated response) by Pppery. — MusikBot talk 21:20, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for file mover

File mover

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Spectra321578

[edit]

Reason for requesting file mover rights I ask to allow me to move files in order to improve the quality of Wikipedia Spectra321578 (talk) 09:30, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

 Not done User is indeffed. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:11, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Zanahary

[edit]

I'd like to help with the backlog and be able to streamline my reviewing with the curation toolbar. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 15:48, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Right now I'm manually moving pages to draftspace, writing messages on authors' Talks, and so on—it would be helpful to have the curation tools. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 17:54, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
@Zanahary: The page curation tool does not have built in elements for draftifying. For that, most of us use User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:19, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Good to know. Still, could make good use of the toolbar. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 20:19, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
 Done - thank you. Shyamal (talk) 07:46, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Prince of Erebor

[edit]

I am interested in helping to eliminate the backlog, particularly for articles involving Chinese, Japanese, or Korean-language sources—languages I am familiar with—that often remain stuck for long periods due to language barriers. I have experience at AFD and AFC, and while the P&G vary across Wikiprojects, I have served as an NPP on zhwiki for four years. —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 08:57, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Agent VII

[edit]

I am requesting this flag to help patrol new articles and drafts. My main focus would be reviewing quality content based on English Wikipedia and marking CSD promotional/advertisement/spam content. Also, identify copyright violations if any when discovered. Thank you. Agent 007 (talk) 09:07, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

User:MCE89

[edit]

I'm reapplying for NPR rights as my three-month trial is about to expire. I unfortunately haven't done that much patrolling during my trial as I've mostly been working in other areas, but hopefully my AfC, CSD, AfD and article creation records are enough to show that I have a sufficient understanding of policies and guidelines to be trusted with this right. If approved, I'm definitely hoping to be more active at NPP in the future to help clear the backlog. MCE89 (talk) 02:33, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 26 July 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 02:40, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Zzz plant

[edit]

Hi, I’m re-applying for NPP permission after a three-month trial. I haven’t been a super prolific reviewer (90 articles + 38 redirects) but I’ve also done more content creation, de-stubbing, and AfD which I hope also helps demonstrate my understanding of the key principles. I’ve found NPP quite rewarding and would love to continue working. Zzz plant (talk) 21:15, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 26 July 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 21:20, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Ivey

[edit]

I am active with cleaning up disambiguation pages, which are often malplaced. Almost all of my RMTR requests end up smoothly going through, and I have had several RMs that I knew had consensus and would have closed, if I could. I believe I have demonstrated good judgement in RM discussions, and will use the permissions to improve the encyclopedia. Thanks. Ivey (talk - contribs) 16:44, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 20:05, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Agent VII

[edit]

While volunteering WP:UAA I find creations that should be in draftspace instead of userspace. Thus, I move using a script that requires additional steps to make a soft-redirect after moving from sandboxes/userspaces. See the log here. I kindly request this flag as it will help me to avoid leaving an unnecessary redirect as discussed at User_talk:Agent_VII#About_your_move. I also intent to use this tool if granted for WP:PMRC#3, WP:PMRC#7 when going through Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you. Agent 007 (talk) 09:58, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Lk95

[edit]

Experienced editor with nearly 100,000 edits over ten years (and over 15 years of experience on the German Wikipedia). I am an active contributor at RM:TR, regularly submitting requests and attentively following each move process. All of my requests have reflected consensus and none have ever been contested, to my knowledge. In addition to filing requests, I have also performed several moves myself. I am kindly requesting the page mover right and hope to contribute at RM:TR when time permits and where my expertise is of use. Thank you for your consideration. Lk95 (talk) 16:04, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 20:06, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Grapesurgeon

[edit]

I've over 100k edits between this and my previous account and have made hundreds (possibly even thousands?) of moves, both discussion-based, bold, and technical. I'm pretty much only getting this to avoid needing to make uncontroversial technical requests, to reduce burden on reviewers. I will only really use this infrequently and for minor and uncontroversial moves. Almost all my uses will likely be romanization of Korean-related (fixing incorrect romanizations for especially historical topics). grapesurgeon (seefooddiet) (talk) 17:51, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 20:07, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Ulubatli Hasan

[edit]

I’m requesting to be granted the page mover right because I’m active at New Page Patrol. With this, I'll be able to move these articles without leaving a redirect would save somebody else the trouble of deleting these tagged redirects.

I believe this right will be benefit for me to contribute the project (I already have it at my native wiki). If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks in advance. Hasan (talk) 12:54, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Cognifex

[edit]

I’d like to request pending changes reviewer rights. I’ve been active for over a month now and have made 700+ edits, mostly focused on improving article tone, adding reliable sources, fixing formatting issues, and cleaning up drafts. I’ve created and improved a number of articles, particularly in biographical and cultural topics. I’m familiar with key policies like WP:NPOV, WP:V, and WP:COPYVIO, and I aim to contribute more to content maintenance through reviewing edits on protected pages. I’m careful with sourcing and would use reviewer tools with that same level of care. Cognifex (talk • contribs) 11:39, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 29 days. — MusikBot talk 11:40, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
 Not done That claimed familiarity with content standards is belied by the sheer number of AfC decline and speedy deletion notices on your talk page. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:09, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Coulomb1

[edit]

I believe I fulfill all of the criteria for gaining permission. I have a pretty long history of editing, and I am trying to step up my editing game! I am trying to branch out in what I do so although this backlog isn't heavy, I would like to help out. Coulomb1 (talk) 01:38, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

 Not done since you've been warned for violating copyright since you requested this. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:10, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Eulersidentity

[edit]

Requesting access to assist with the backlog in helping to ensure pending edits meet the criteria of the Wikipedia policies & guidelines. Eulersidentity (talk) 10:13, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

User:JesusisGreat7

[edit]

I often come across edits by new users and IPs that go unreviewed. I saw many peacock terms and promotional phrases added in such edits. I’m familiar with core content policies and regularly monitor recent changes. Thanks Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 08:05, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

 Not done This is at least your 10th permission request, all of which were declined. You might qualify for PCR on your own merits but granting more permissions would only encourage you to keep hassling us. No thanks. Please spend at least a month, preferably much longer, without requesting any advanced permissions. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:58, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Leafy46

[edit]

I am requesting rollback in order to better fight vandalism. This is my second request attempt, with my first being over a year ago; it was rejected because my work patrolling recent changes was deemed too sporadic. Despite my patrolling of recent changes admittedly still being somewhat sporadic, I have come across two separate instances when having rollback rights would have allowed me to better contribute to the project (here and here). I consistently make sure to notify editors when reverting their edits, and I feel that I have a good track record when it comes to identifying vandalism in order to use rollback rights responsibly. Thanks. Leafy46 (talk) 05:00, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:10, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Epsilon.Prota

[edit]

Hi - I've been patrolling the edit filter log for a few months and have had a few problems recently with the log occasionally disallowing Twinkle rollbacks, especially on unreferenced numeric changes. Am requesting MediaWiki rollback rights to avoid this in future. Thanks. Epsilon.Prota talk 22:24, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi Epsilon.Prota, most of these won't be the type of "obvious vandalism" WP:ROLLBACKUSE refers to. Will you use a script to prompt you for an edit summary when using rollback for such tasks? Also, how do you ensure that the numeric change wasn't a correction and you're restoring unverifiable information? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:07, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi ToBeFree - I intend to continue using Twinkle and Redwarn for the majority of my CV work, and would only use MediaWiki rollback in the uncommon situations where the edit filter flags such reverts. In such cases, I'd make sure to use Huggle or Antivandal to insert edit summaries, as I do when using Twinkle/Redwarn. Also, an unsourced numeric change by definition can't be a correction without a supporting reference. Reverting such changes serves to alert (in the majority of cases) or remind users of Wikipedia's verifiability policies. If you have any more questions or concerns, please let me know - Thanks! Epsilon.Prota talk 11:47, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Epsilon.Prota, regarding verifiability, I was primarily concerned about infoboxes with unsourced numbers that are then replaced by correct numbers from an unspecified source. I was afraid that you might revert this, which would be a problem (you'd restore unverifiable material *and* revert an improvement). The best approach to such situations would be removing the disputed number entirely (or finding a source, but that obviously can't be a requirement). Thus, rollback would be the wrong tool in such cases. As long as you are aware of that, all is good. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:20, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:20, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

User:GiraffeLover19

[edit]

I’ve spent the last few days patrolling the edit log and reverting vandalism manually, but now I would like to use learn to use tools like Anti-Vandal and Twinkle instead of just manually doing it myself. GiraffeLover19 (talk) 14:31, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

 Not done Your antivandalism work so far has been very helpful, but I have noticed that you are not notifying users with warnings when you revert nonconstructive edits. Please make using the graduated warning templates into a habit before requesting rollback again—after which you will be a great candidate for rollback. Malinaccier (talk) 19:54, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Bntlyprce

[edit]

For the last 6 months I have been working on vandalism through recent changes and by also viewing the abuse log. I've encountered some situations that I have cleaned up that having the rollback permission would have saved a tremendous amount of time I believe that I meet all the requirements outlined to receive the permission, and by receiving the permission it would allow me to contribute to the great cause of keeping Wikipedia free from vandalism. Bntlyprce (talk) 16:55, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 190 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 03:30, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
 Done Malinaccier (talk) 19:57, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for template editor

Template editor

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:GauchoDude

[edit]

Increasing number of edits into the template space after being an article contributor for years. Running across more protected templates, such as Infobox gymnast, for which I'd need access. Already have much experience editing and creating templates, as well as sandbox to production edits. GauchoDude (talk) 20:46, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:
  1. Green tickY (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 19)
  2. Green tickY (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~22k)
  3. Green tickY (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~630)
  4. Green tickY (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: NA)
  5. Red XN (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: ~1)
  6. Red XN (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: ~2)
Primefac (talk) 21:37, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Not sure if I'm supposed to reply to this or not? Clearly well surpass the vast majority of guidelines and a few short on some. Please advise if you have any further questions for me? GauchoDude (talk) 22:29, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
You can if you want. It's easy to run the numbers, just didn't have the bandwidth to do a full review. Primefac (talk) 22:47, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Few questions for you:
  • Do you intend to edit LUA modules?
  • Do you intend to contribute to the other associated areas (contentmodels, edit notices, etc. Basically anything other then templates build on wikitext)?
  • Please review Wikipedia:High-risk templates, let us know if you have any questions about it.
  • Do you understand that in general, most changes to highly used templates should be proposed and tested first - as opposed to the standard WP:BRD process? (note: it is generally acceptable to promote tests to the primary page after a reasonable time so long as there is no objection).
— xaosflux Talk 13:33, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
  • I don't believe so.
  • No.
  • Already done.
  • Yes. GauchoDude (talk) 19:55, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Est. 2021

[edit]

@Primefac: (permalink) Re-applying for the permission, expiring on 24 July 2025. (edit requests) — Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 20:22, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary template editor rights by Primefac (expires 00:00, 24 July 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 20:30, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

    Usefull templates

    [edit]
    • {{subst:Hockey|PlayerName}} ~~~~
    • {{subst:Uw-block1|time=Duration|reason=For a different reason|sig=-~~~~}}

    Old AFD

    [edit]
    {{oldafdfull
| date = 
| result = 
| page = 
}}

    Ice hockey player infobox

    [edit]
    {{Infobox Ice Hockey Player
| image           = 
| image_caption   =
| image_size      = 
| position        = 
| shoots          = 
| shot            = 
| catches         = 
| caught          = 
| nickname        = 
| height_ft       = 
| height_in       = 
| weight_lb       = 
| team            = 
| league          = 
| prospect_team   = 
| prospect_league =
| former_teams    = 
| played_for      = 
| nationality     = 
| nationality_2   = 
| birth_date      = 
| birth_place     = 
| death_date      = 
| death_place     = 
| draft           = 
| draft_year      = 
| draft_team      = 
| wha_draft       =  
| wha_draft_year  = 
| wha_draft_team  = 
| career_start    = 
| career_end      = 
| halloffame      = 
| website         = 
}}
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Djsasso/tools&oldid=555069672"