User:Bisma o/sandbox

Adding an section for all of the main points discussed during this conferences. universal Education reduction on infant mortality reduction on maternal mortality access to reproductive and sexual health services including family planning ( but have family planing be it own section) The sections should not only be updated with new dated but also what steps some of the countries took to reach these goals.

how has these rates effected the united states and world. Infant Mortality

The infant mortality rate around the world has overall decreased. In 1990 the infant mortality rate was 64.8 deaths pre 1000 live births and in 2016 the infant mortality rate has been reduced by more than ½ to 30.5 deaths per 1000 live births. This can be accounted for better access to medical interventions for infants up to the age of 5. When it comes to maternal mortality rate the amount of deaths that occur around the world have not gone down substantially “About 830 women die from pregnancy- or childbirth-related complications around the world every day”.

“Infant Mortality.” World Health Organization, World Health Organization, www.who.int/gho/child_health/mortality/neonatal_infant_text/en/.

“Maternal Mortality.” World Health Organization, World Health Organization, www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs348/en/.

                     International Conference on Population and Development Much more needs to be added to this article and there are many opportunities to connect this back to our course material. Please also make sure to review how sources are cited in Wikipedia - Prof H This Article just touches on the main goals that were planned during this conferences, but no information about if these goals were achieved. The article failed to go into detail about simple information about what governments or organization were present. What was the impact of the the meeting? The article only clarified the “reproductive health” goal that was discuss and how this term was taken out of context.

Article Evaluation

The US census bureau article stayed on topic. The article did not have random tangents inserted in it. The article seemed like it was just informative on the census. It did not take side or lean towards one side. The article went into detail the importance of the 10 years’ census and how it effects our federal and local government, but it only listed who else uses the data. It listed how this information can come into play when it comes to formation of new transportation systems, and police/fire departments. Most of the citations listed in the article are reliable. Most of the sources did support the claims used in the article. The sources seem up to data. On the right track with this evaluation, but many details are missing... - Prof Hammad