User:Ben MacDui/Admin Toolbox
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- Baguettesonme (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1361 (LTA 1361, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:01, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Daniel Case (talk) 04:41, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- 184.152.65.118 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:07, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Miamirapper (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:18, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Daniel Case (talk) 04:43, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- 103.125.149.154 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1362 (LTA 1362, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:28, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- 180.242.213.51 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1345 (LTA 1345, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:36, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Declined. If there edits are undesirable, I wouldn't know, since they've not been reverted or warned. Daniel Case (talk) 04:46, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- 174.235.49.127 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:48, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Warned user. Up to level 3 now. Daniel Case (talk) 04:47, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- 43.247.66.161 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1345 (LTA 1345, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:01, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Well, no apparent vandalism or disruption, anyway. Daniel Case (talk) 04:48, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:2c3:c783:e800:9cde:4237:6f90:c34 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:04, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Warned user. Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Susan nakawuki (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Susan Nakawuki (diff): vandalism after final warning. 45dogs (they/them) (talk) 01:31, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Declined. I left her a message, and frankly I think it's bad form to block someone for removing potential BLP vios from an article about themselves. Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- 162.10.230.31 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Added misleading and defamatory content to the Century Pacific article under the "Animal Welfare" section, including promotional links to a defamatory site (centurypacificshame.com). Appears to be part of a coordinated disinformation campaign. Reverted by Pencilceaser123. JJutoy (talk) 02:13, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. Huh? Their one edit removed those claims. Sure you reported the right editor? Daniel Case (talk) 05:03, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- 2600:387:15:3A18:0:0:0:2 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) "This IP address is currently partially blocked" and the editor just vandalized article 2000 Little League World Series, suggesting a broader restriction may be warranted. Dmoore5556 (talk) 03:12, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Rsjaffe: Can you take a look at this? Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:29, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Prizefighterrecords (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Officialsamkin (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Username.zip (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- TriOfficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Krishna Rao1488 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Organschool (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- OfficialPablo (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Carefullmarketing (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Areddituser2023 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Lawsb (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Special:AbuseLog/41352690. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:21, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- Sheffield United Preservation Society (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. 🧙♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 21:04, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- Rajfusion74 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 02:04, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Sanadi Shakir (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Draft:Shakir Sanadi. GiraffeLover19 (talk) 03:22, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Natvbasics (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See User:Natvbasics/sandbox. Annh07 (talk) 03:50, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Tiquetes Mexico (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. (CC) Tbhotch™ 04:09, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Labaydan (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See userpage. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:32, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Tehpucuk465 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See User:Tehpucuk465. Annh07 (talk) 05:07, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Persistent low-quality edits by IP users Safety In Obscurity (talk) 18:27, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One IP user, two days ago. Favonian (talk) 18:59, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated vandalism by user changing legitimate company links to personal artist page. Need protection against promotional editing. NEXTManagement (talk) 19:13, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- Declined for obvious reasons. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 19:20, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism by an IP hopper Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Entranced98 (talk) 21:21, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by blocked user User:Harry the house. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 21:23, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing by blocked user User:Harry the house. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 21:24, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing by blocked user User:Harry the house. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 21:24, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 21:26, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued LTA sock edits per WP:LTA/PCH shortly after expiration of previous six-month semi-. --Finngall talk 22:01, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:20, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting indefinite semi-protection due to personal attacks and harassment from User:LVLewitinn. Thank you. LegalTech (talk) 22:24, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of personal attacks from an IP hopper. lullabying (talk) 22:33, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated IP vandalism from multiple accounts. Epsilon.Prota talk 00:04, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Request Semi-protection for Kun Khmer page. Repeated vandalism from unregistered user. Pallettownboxing (talk) 01:01, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of unsourced or POV content added by IP adresses Trade (talk) 01:05, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Constant edit warring, with one user constantly reverting edits GiraffeLover19 (talk) 03:03, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Recent vandalism, the verdict is still less than a month old Icedshakenespresso (talk) 03:26, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:GS/MJ. Persistent addition of original research. (CC) Tbhotch™ 04:16, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Unprotection: No longer nessecary: This article has been semi-protected since 2011 due to BLP violations. Davis has been dead for 11 years now, so the reason for the protection no longer applies here. The protecting administrator hasn't been active since at least 2014. BriDash9000 (talk) 17:30, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Unprotection: No longer nessecary: This article has been semi-protected since 2011 due to BLP violations. Moore has been dead for four years now, so the reason for the protection no longer applies here. The protecting administrator was last active almost ten months ago. BriDash9000 (talk) 17:30, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Unprotection: No longer nessecary: This article has been semi-protected since 2015 due to BLP violations. Thom has been dead for two years now, so the reason for the protection no longer applies here. The protecting administrator hasn't been active since at least 2015. BriDash9000 (talk) 17:30, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
- ℚ(√5) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- ℚ(φ) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- ℚ(ϕ) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Can these all be created as redirects to Golden field? The titles Q(√5), Q(φ), Q(ϕ) redirect there already. –jacobolus (t) 21:25, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 0 protected edit requests | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 10:28, 15 July 2025 (UTC) |
| 12 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:05, 16 July 2025 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
Hi. Based upon my learning and experience over the years of editing on Wikipedia (almost a decade now), I have created very selected pages which I find qualifying Wikipedia policies. If I find them trending in news but un-complying with the policies, I usually leave a redirect, or occasionally start with the draft. I believe not a single page that I created and/or majorly contributed has been deleted, and many respected editors and admins whom I had interacted with have always been helpful and supportive, believing in my good faith. Plus I only rewrite those articles in bad state which I find relevant, and not every other random article. However, due to recent attacks by sock puppetry over my edits, I want to be an autopatrolled user, so that I can easily continue volunteering independently here, and participate in the ongoing Destubathon as well. I promise I will not misuse this position. Thank you! M. Billoo 13:24, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
7-year vet of the site, multiple GANs and DYKs, 51 mainspace articles created of which 49 are live (G6 and G7 deletions for the other two). Etzedek24 (Talk) (Contribs) 20:54, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
Resubmitting #User:Human Right Wiki above as a procedural action, not an endorsement on the merits. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:39, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello there, my respect to you! I would like to request for getting autopatrolled rights because I contribute interesting articles to both English and Simple Wikipedia. I have over 700 edits, which is over the requirements, and my account is over 3 months old. If I get autopatrolled rights, I will never forget this appreciation I got and I will continue contributing to Wikipedia, and I will also continue to take responsibilities for my actions. Thanks! Waiting for a feedback. :-) Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 13:06, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
I have been on Wikipedia for more than a decade, and I truly feel that it is one of my great passions in life. I have more than 30,000 edits, and I am credited with more than 300 articles that are not Redirects or Disambiguation pages. (I personally take credit for more than 100 of these, which did not originate as Redirect pages.) Although I continue to propose Draft pages to this day when I am not 100% confident myself about notability, I frequently go straight to the mainspace and have made a number of articles that have been significant in some form or field, with my particular focus being on film industry and electoral politics pages. Recently, I redirected a few thousand Supreme Court of the United States cases to the case volumes in which they were listed. It was a large-scale project for me, but in the end it was decided that redlinks would be better for promoting caseload knowledge, something that I agreed to and I believe will continue to service our Wikipedia community. For this reason, it might appear that I have a large number of deleted pages, but this is almost exclusively due to this particular project; I had an edit deletion rate of less than 2%, and I had not had a page that I created taken down in years, not since I was a far more novice editor. (You can read more about that SCOTUS discussion here.) I believe that being autopatrolled will continue to allow me to contribute to the Wikipedia community, and that is why I am reaching out to ask for permissions. I am happy to answer any questions or improve any articles that I have created if there is anything noticeable that needs help. Although I have long been looking to increase my permissions and role in the community, I quite frankly have always had impostor syndrome stop me from asking, but a bit of encouragement from Liz made me try. Thank you so much! PickleG13 (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Fairly prolific article creator and translator who has written on a number of topics. I had nearly no complaints reviewing their creations for notability and text-source integrity, and they were all generally well-written and -formatted. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 09:45, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
I was granted a two month trial for this. Have created 100+ articles with 10K+ edits and will continue to do so. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 23:19, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
This user has contributed a number of articles that are of quite good initial quality. David Palmer//cloventt (talk) 23:13, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request Autopatrolled rights for my account. I've made 74 articles, mostly BLPs. None of my articles have been deleted, and all are above stub-class. I have also recently had two DYK hooks approved and I make sure to create talk pages for my articles. I hope to cut down on the NPP backlog as I continue to create. 24Anonymous (talk) 03:20, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
I like regular expressions and fixing typos. LordDiscord (talk) 02:26, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Would like to fix typos do maintenance & other stuff using JWB. Thanks! Ophyrius (he/him
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed[edit]
The number of protests and the count are incorrect. I keep a weekly list of protest and counts. Myself and volunteers collected counts from 2133 sites, which is about 92% of sites that day. They are cited. Many are from organizer. It can be seen https://www.wethepeopledissent.net. The count we arrived at was 4.1 to 5.2 million. at about 2300 sites. In addition, I would like to add the number of protests and counts for each state. There's a file with the number of protests and the state count about halfway down the page. https://www.wethepeopledissent.net If you'd like to see the work I do to verify my knowledge, I report on protests on Substack weekly: https://thepeopledissent.substack.com I would be happy to add them if you'd like to grant editor status. We the People Dissent (talk) 03:04, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights: I am requesting extended confirmed rights as I have made over 700 constructive edits across the English Wikipedia, and my account is over 30 days old. I have created multiple new articles, participated in improving existing pages, and made meaningful contributions to content related to Hinduism and Nepalese culture. I would like to be able to move articles from draft space to mainspace and edit semi-protected pages for ongoing work. Thank you for considering my request. Related tools and contributions: rfar · spi · cci Cognifex (talk • contribs) 07:04, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights Littlestepsforward (talk) 09:11, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator[edit] |
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File mover[edit] |
| There are no outstanding requests for the mass message sender flag. |
|---|
Mass message sender[edit] |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights Littlestepsforward (talk) 09:13, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
I had not realised there was such a big backlog at NPP and would like to help reduce it; I am an experienced editor and article creator myself, and would be very happy to do more to help new editors learn about Wikipedia. Tony Holkham (Talk) 12:44, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
Hello, I've been active in tackling relists and closures on XfD logs, and am requesting the page mover right to be able to cleanly move pages to userspace or draftspace when there is consensus to do so; I sometimes encounter discussions like that during my log runs. Granting the page mover right would lighten the workload for admins having to do additional housekeeping (i.e. deleting redirects) or more closures. Thanks for considering this request. Left guide (talk) 07:33, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting page mover rights Littlestepsforward (talk) 09:15, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights Littlestepsforward (talk) 09:14, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
I’d like to request pending changes reviewer rights. I’ve been active for over a month now and have made 700+ edits, mostly focused on improving article tone, adding reliable sources, fixing formatting issues, and cleaning up drafts. I’ve created and improved a number of articles, particularly in biographical and cultural topics. I’m familiar with key policies like WP:NPOV, WP:V, and WP:COPYVIO, and I aim to contribute more to content maintenance through reviewing edits on protected pages. I’m careful with sourcing and would use reviewer tools with that same level of care. Cognifex (talk • contribs) 11:39, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
Hi, I am a CVU on the German Wikipedia and I am becoming more involved into fighting X-Wiki vandalism. On dewp I am Sichter (Rollback&Review) and temporary-account-viewer. Since my intentions are to fight global vandalism, I will not use the user right locally until I have studied Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback. NDG (talk) 07:49, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I would like rollback rights please so that I could use Huggle to fight vandalism on recent changes. I've made 2200 edits and have patrolled recent changes for a few months now. Thank you for considering my request. m a MANÍ1990(talk | contribs) 23:33, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting rollback in order to better fight vandalism. This is my second request attempt, with my first being over a year ago; it was rejected because my work patrolling recent changes was deemed too sporadic. Despite my patrolling of recent changes admittedly still being somewhat sporadic, I have come across two separate instances when having rollback rights would have allowed me to better contribute to the project (here and here). I consistently make sure to notify editors when reverting their edits, and I feel that I have a good track record when it comes to identifying vandalism in order to use rollback rights responsibly. Thanks. Leafy46 (talk) 05:00, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights Littlestepsforward (talk) 09:13, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor[edit]
Increasing number of edits into the template space after being an article contributor for years. Running across more protected templates, such as Infobox gymnast, for which I'd need access. Already have much experience editing and creating templates, as well as sandbox to production edits. GauchoDude (talk) 20:46, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Action | Count |
|---|---|
| Edits | 44405 |
| Edits+Deleted | 44987 |
| Pages deleted | 1751 |
| Pages restored | 10 |
| Pages protected | 37 |
| Protections modified | 1 |
| Users blocked | 122 |
| Users reblocked | 3 |
| Users unblocked | 3 |
| User rights modified | 1 |
| Users created | 1 |
Ben MacDui (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
Clean-up
[edit]- New Pages
- Speedy
- {{notenglish|Spanish}
- {{notability|organizations}
- {{unreferenced}
- {{Views needing attribution|date=}
- {{Unreferencedsection|date=}
Anti-vandal tools
[edit]- {{Vandal|username}
- {{IPvandal|no}
| Click here to show warnings | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hover over the curly braces to see a summary of the contents. | ||||||
| Don't forget to substitute these templates (more information) | ||||||
| Description | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 4im | |
| Editing tests | {{subst:uw-test1}} | {{subst:uw-test2}} | {{subst:uw-test3}} | Escalate ↓ | Escalate ↓ | |
| Vandalism | {{subst:uw-vandalism1}} | {{subst:uw-vandalism2}} | {{subst:uw-vandalism3}} | {{subst:uw-vandalism4}} | {{subst:uw-vandalism4im}} | |
| Page blanking, removal of content or templates | {{subst:uw-delete1}} | {{subst:uw-delete2}} | {{subst:uw-delete3}} | {{subst:uw-delete4}} | {{subst:uw-delete4im}} | |
| Adding spam links | {{subst:uw-spam1}} | {{subst:uw-spam2}} | {{subst:uw-spam3}} | {{subst:uw-spam4}} | {{subst:uw-spam4im}} | |