Talk:Vaginal introital laxity
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for helping creating this well-referenced page that fills a gap here on Wikipedia. The structure and content are clear; it would be great to integrate it better by linking it from other pages.
Klbrain (talk) 11:59, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Requested move 29 March 2025
[edit]
![]() | It has been proposed in this section that Vaginal introital laxity be renamed and moved to Vaginal laxity. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Vaginal introital laxity → Vaginal laxity – Some of the article discusses the broader topic of Vaginal introital laxity, and as a recent PROD highlighted, the latter is the accesed ICD-11 name. Hence, it would be better to use this page as a starting point for a slightly broader topic, for which there is currently no page (just a redirect to Vagina). Klbrain (talk) 12:20, 29 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 13:11, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Medicine has been notified of this discussion. TarnishedPathtalk 13:11, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- These are not synonyms, the introitus is different from the vagina. It was created by two brand new accounts that haven't edited since. I suspect this is credibility laundering, i.e. a paid article intended to trying to sell women dangerous therapies in Turkey for a made up problem that is not actually accepted by the medical community as requiring treatment. I will be deleting everything that is badly sourced. I don't think this needs its own article. Mvolz (talk) 15:17, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Do we need separate articles (or sections?) for laxity in the Introitus to the vagina vs laxity of the vaginal canal? WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:02, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- This link to PubMed search results might be useful if you want to find some decent sources. It is for the more general name; the only result found that mentions "introital" is pmid 36162938. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:26, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- These are not synonyms, the introitus is different from the vagina. It was created by two brand new accounts that haven't edited since. I suspect this is credibility laundering, i.e. a paid article intended to trying to sell women dangerous therapies in Turkey for a made up problem that is not actually accepted by the medical community as requiring treatment. I will be deleting everything that is badly sourced. I don't think this needs its own article. Mvolz (talk) 15:17, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- I think plausibly it should just be merged with pelvic floor dysfunction, since it's a subclass of it. https://icd.who.int/browse/2025-01/mms/en#1364574814 Mvolz (talk) 10:42, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- That's sexual dysfunction. https://icd.who.int/browse/2025-01/mms/en#1804054712 (GA34.1) is pain caused by Vaginal laxity. There doesn't seem to be a "laxity is an objective problem even if it doesn't hurt or interfere with sex" category. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:56, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- I think plausibly it should just be merged with pelvic floor dysfunction, since it's a subclass of it. https://icd.who.int/browse/2025-01/mms/en#1364574814 Mvolz (talk) 10:42, 7 April 2025 (UTC)