Talk:Teen Week

Teen Week is currently an Albums good article nominee. Nominated by Locust member (talk) at 21:08, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

deadair rerelease

the wikipedia article says the abridged version was released by deadair but the abridged version was originally self released until 2024 when it got rereleased by deadair Sastofficial (talk) 13:55, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I forgot that they self-released it first.

Fixed Locust member (talk) 15:47, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Teen Week/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Locust member (talk · contribs) 21:08, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Chchcheckit (talk · contribs) 17:17, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Let's start here. (1st part of efforts to make up for A Great Chaos wordcount) // Chchcheckit (talk) 17:17, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank uuu Locust member (talk) 17:34, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Broad

Concise as could possibly be and covers relevant bases

Prose

remove the note about TW being "debut". it might be retroactively
- Done
The final track, "Seventeen", begins with an opening line of "I hate everything 'cause everything hates me too".[8] The song was written about Remover's feelings of jealousy toward their friends, who are more popular musicians than themself, and being looked down on at school. Sundaresan wrote that the line "I wish I blew up like yesterday" is "less about material aspiration than it is about becoming".[1] The theme of adolescence is shown on the track, with the line "Go to college, have a shit time / I'll get a job and I won't be happy / But if you ask I'll say I'm fine".[8] You could probably make this a little tighter, especially with the last sentence, whose lyrics you could probably do w/out
- Done
point of potential interest: per Stereogum, EP leaked day before releaes
- I saw this before and completely forgot to include it,,..,f,gsdjs Done

References

Mainly based on reliable sources: soundcloud refs are mainly for release dates. To conform with WP:PRIMARY I suggest that you move the references to the infobox rather than them being in prose.
- Hmm so you just think I should put the singles in infobox, and disregard them in body? (not disagreeing cause of the iffy sourcing but I feel like the reader should know there were singles (just if they read the body?))
  - Spinning back to this, the Lyrical Lemonade source you gave me mentions that those are singles. Can we keep it in body if I include that source to back it up? (I get Lyrical Lemonade is not the most verifiable sources out there and the interview will be covered by WP:ABOUTSELF but I mean Bugara is just stating that those were singles which is an uncontroversial claim)
references you could use:
- VERY useful ref/interview from just before EP's release in 2021
- laut.de review
- laut.de end of year EPs list
- Paste 37 on 100 Greatest EPs of All Time (2024)
- potentially useful ref for reception (legacy?)
- use for reception summary: "met with critical praise"
  - holy balls thanks for all of these. I'll ping u when I get all of this information entered (how tf did I miss these ????? google news is DOGSHIT)
    - mein freund, i use google. you gotta go crazy doing searches like "teen week" "2020" (Both quotes same search) yada yada. basically use quotes around keywords and occasionally searching with "site:(insert domain)" if you wanna be that thorough idk
    - wait you only use google news????????? Facepalm // Chchcheckit (talk) 00:01, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

haha I don't only use it but it is what I majorly use. and ty for the tips Locust member (talk) 13:39, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

Earwig passes: 25.7%
Sample used is relevant and conforms to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Music samples
you should probably write better rationale for the cover art
- explain more pls. it has a fair use rationale

NPOV

pending

Stable

Largely unchanged since March 1, 2025

progress. on the basis of the refs i found i will give you time to implement them/change things // Chchcheckit (talk) 19:05, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]