Talk:Teen Week/GA1

GA review

Passed. // Chchcheckit (talk) 11:14, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Locust member (talk · contribs) 21:08, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Chchcheckit (talk · contribs) 17:17, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Let's start here. (1st part of efforts to make up for A Great Chaos wordcount) // Chchcheckit (talk) 17:17, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank uuu Locust member (talk) 17:34, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Locust member are ya still planning on fixing things up? Chchcheckit (talk) 12:34, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yea sorry, my last few days have evaporated. will get these done by tonight est Locust member (talk) 20:26, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I got everything done (for now) Locust member (talk) 22:05, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Broad

Concise as could possibly be and covers relevant bases

Prose

remove the note about TW being "debut". it might be retroactively
- Done
The final track, "Seventeen", begins with an opening line of "I hate everything 'cause everything hates me too".[8] The song was written about Remover's feelings of jealousy toward their friends, who are more popular musicians than themself, and being looked down on at school. Sundaresan wrote that the line "I wish I blew up like yesterday" is "less about material aspiration than it is about becoming".[1] The theme of adolescence is shown on the track, with the line "Go to college, have a shit time / I'll get a job and I won't be happy / But if you ask I'll say I'm fine".[8] You could probably make this a little tighter, especially with the last sentence, whose lyrics you could probably do w/out
- Done
point of potential interest: per Stereogum, EP leaked day before releaes
- I saw this before and completely forgot to include it,,..,f,gsdjs Done
Organize the accolades chronologically; place the laut 2021 eps list as the last line of first paragraph as a distinction of contemporary and retrospect // Chchcheckit (talk) 12:51, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done Locust member (talk) 00:01, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

random copyediting thought, since this feels more chronological/ordered:

Teen Week is the second extended play (EP) by the American musician Jane Remover. It was self-released under their former name Dltzk on February 26, 2021, before they came out as a trans woman in 2022.[a] Remover wrote songs for the EP while in school and at home and produced the EP while they were applying to colleges. Teen Week is a digicore and progressive pop EP inspired by the electronica and electronic dance music of the musician Porter Robinson; some tracks feature 16-bit or 8-bit music and the Amen break. Its lyricism pertains to personal growth struggles, as well as themes of adolescence. After voicing their frustrations with the EP, Remover released an abridged version in 2022.

Teen Week was preceded by two singles, "Woodside Gardens 16 December 2012" and "52 Blue Mondays". It received critical praise upon release, with laut.de ranking it among the best EPs of the year and Pitchfork considering it one of the best progressive pop albums of the year. The EP has later been recognized as a milestone in digicore by audiences and a pioneering release in the genre by publications. The Line of Best Fit deemed it one of the best hyperpop releases of all time, while Paste deemed it one of the greatest EPs of all time.

- Done
had a glance, all good. // Chchcheckit (talk) 11:14, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

Mainly based on reliable sources: soundcloud refs are mainly for release dates. To conform with WP:PRIMARY I suggest that you move the references to the infobox rather than them being in prose.
- Hmm so you just think I should put the singles in infobox, and disregard them in body? (not disagreeing cause of the iffy sourcing but I feel like the reader should know there were singles (just if they read the body?))
  - Spinning back to this, the Lyrical Lemonade source you gave me mentions that those are singles. Can we keep it in body if I include that source to back it up? (I get Lyrical Lemonade is not the most verifiable sources out there and the interview will be covered by WP:ABOUTSELF but I mean Bugara is just stating that those were singles which is an uncontroversial claim)
    - @Chchcheckit: I have a question here Locust member (talk) 20:28, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
references you could use:
- VERY useful ref/interview from just before EP's release in 2021
  - Added
- laut.de review
  - Added
- laut.de end of year EPs list
  - Added
- Paste 37 on 100 Greatest EPs of All Time (2024)
  - Added
- potentially useful ref for reception (legacy?)
  - Added
- use for reception summary: "met with critical praise"
  - Added
  - holy balls thanks for all of these. I'll ping u when I get all of this information entered (how tf did I miss these ????? google news is DOGSHIT)
    - mein freund, i use google. you gotta go crazy doing searches like "teen week" "2020" (Both quotes same search) yada yada. basically use quotes around keywords and occasionally searching with "site:(insert domain)" if you wanna be that thorough idk
    - wait you only use google news????????? Facepalm // Chchcheckit (talk) 00:01, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

haha I don't only use it but it is what I majorly use. and ty for the tips Locust member (talk) 13:39, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yeah ofc // Chchcheckit (talk) 21:56, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

place the laut.de references in the review section since they r not there. i added to infobox // Chchcheckit (talk) 12:51, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
wdym? the refs are placed after their respective sentences in every section. (thank u for putting it in infobox) Locust member (talk) 00:03, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
no i think you were citing the laut.de end of year list instead of the review Chchcheckit (talk) 00:09, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
yea idek how I did that shit but Fixed Locust member (talk) 01:45, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
note f is written in english instead of german // Chchcheckit (talk) 12:51, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Locust member (talk) 00:02, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
provide year of line of best fit hyperpop list // Chchcheckit (talk) 12:52, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Locust member (talk) 00:03, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

Earwig: passes, 25.9%
Sample used is relevant and conforms to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Music samples
you should probably write better rationale for the cover art
- explain more pls. it has a fair use rationale
  - @Chchcheckit: and another questiuon here Locust member (talk) 20:28, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

all good here, critical summary is cited as are the accolades so yeah it's good

Stable

Largely unchanged since March 1, 2025

progress. on the basis of the refs i found i will give you time to implement them/change things // Chchcheckit (talk) 19:05, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]