This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Partition of India article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Partition of India is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
Sam Wineburg and Nadav Ziv (October 17, 2024). "Go ahead and use Wikipedia for research". The Boston Globe. Retrieved October 18, 2024. The claim that "anyone can change" Wikipedia isn't true. Try tampering with the entries for "Partition of India," "Donald Trump," "Gamergate," or "Coat of arms of Lithuania" and you'll smash right into a lock icon, indicating that the page is "protected."
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a contentious topic. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
This article is written in Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi English. The narrative sections that are not quoting Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi usage should avoid all forms that are not common to these varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 June 2025
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
The very last 2 sentences of the "Region Affected by Partition" section states "Women were raped and sexually assaulted. Many of those killed, raped and injured had come to these areas to escape massacres in West Punjab, which had become part of Pakistan."
These statements specifically imply that Pashtun tribal militias and the Pakistani Military, as mentioned in the previous sentence, are responsible for these acts.This is quite a substantial claim, as it is attributing mass atrocities to groups which are also implicated in this conflict. It is also noteworthy that there is no citation or reference associated with these statements.
In effort improve the clarity of the writing, as well as reduce any biases in the writing of the article, I propose either the removal of these statements, or that they be amended such that they are prefaced with "There have been reports that...", along with being flagged with "Requiring Citation" 122.199.16.32 (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Instead of adding: ""There have been reports that..." which I don't know if there have been, I added a citation needed tag at the end of each of those two sentences, so the reader knows that we cannot confirm this. Friendly, Lova Falk (talk) 08:28, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 24 August 2025
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Women’s Narratives of Partition
Scholarship on Partition literature has emphasized the importance of women’s narratives, which often foreground the gendered dimensions of displacement, violence, and memory. Urvashi Butalia’s The Other Side of Silence (1998) and Ritu Menon and Kamla Bhasin’s Borders and Boundaries: Women in India’s Partition (1998) are considered landmark works that documented oral histories and highlighted women’s voices in Partition memory.
Subsequent scholarship has extended these concerns to literary and cultural studies. For instance, Anjali Gera Roy and Nandi Bhatia’s edited volumes have examined women’s creative responses to Partition in fiction, theatre, and film.[1]
The study of Partition has also increasingly engaged with memory studies and the concept of postmemory, a term popularized by Marianne Hirsch to describe the transmission of trauma across generations. Scholars such as Alok Bhalla, Jasbir Jain, and Priya Kumar have examined how Partition literature functions as an archive of memory, while also exploring silences, erasures, and intergenerational remembrance.[2][3]
More recent doctoral research by Sana Asif explores Muslim women’s Partition fiction through the frameworks of feminist geography and memory studies, analyzing how homes, cities, and nations are reconfigured in narratives of trauma, displacement, and belonging.[4]
Together, these works highlight the ways in which women’s perspectives — through oral histories, autobiographical accounts, and fictional narratives — reshape the understanding of Partition as a lived and gendered experience. Gender-space-partition (talk) 01:21, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
^Anjali Gera Roy and Nandi Bhatia (eds.), Partitioned Lives: Narratives of Home, Displacement, and Resettlement (Pearson, 2008).
^Marianne Hirsch, Family Frames: Photography, Narrative, and Postmemory (Harvard University Press, 1997).
^Priya Kumar, "Testimonies of Loss and Memory: Partition and the Haunting of a Nation," Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 25, no. 1 (2005): 104–122.
^Sana Asif, Gender and Spaces in Partition Fiction: A Study of Select Novels by Muslim Women (PhD thesis, National Institute of Technology Patna, 2022). Available at: [http://hdl.handle.net/10603/591661
]
You need to mention the page number also. In the current version, the death toll is mentioned as “200,000–2 million”, citing Talbot & Singh (2009, p. 2). Chronos.Zx (talk) 02:12, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]