Jump to content

Talk:Netball

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNetball has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 23, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
March 26, 2011Good article nomineeListed
March 27, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 3, 2011Good article reassessmentDelisted
August 20, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
December 15, 2011Good article nomineeListed
October 12, 2023Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Significant uncited material, while the existing references are predominantly from 2011 or earlier; thus several sections are out of date, and GA criterion 3a is violated. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:37, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Things like the rules of netball don't need to be cited per WP:SKYISBLUE, and it's not obvious why an article on the sport of netball in general would require recent sources. Taking a look at the article, the citations and coverage seem to have held up pretty well over 10+ years, so you're going to have to be more specific than that about your concerns. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 06:31, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am willing to work on the article to provide additional references. If the concern is criterion 3a "addresses the main aspects of the topic", then I agree with Sportsfan77777. Provide details of what you believe to be out of date, with appropriate references to back them up. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 08:27, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article review

[edit]

While this article has been recently reviewed, upon another look it looks like there are still lots of uncited statements, including the "Equipment" section, which has an orange "more sources needed" banner. @Sportsfan77777 and Hawkeye7: or any other talk page watchers: is anyone interested in addressing this? Of course, there is no obligation to do so. Z1720 (talk) 04:53, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result pending

Uncited statements, including the "Equipment" section and most of the "Comparison with basketball" section. Z1720 (talk) 16:01, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]