Talk:Motability

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Disability

Motability is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability

Politics of the United Kingdom

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Motability. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723074007/http://www.motability.co.uk/documents/website/Mot/Annual%20Reports/Annual_Report_2006-2007.pdf to http://www.motability.co.uk/documents/website/Mot/Annual%20Reports/Annual_Report_2006-2007.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:53, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

'Multiple Issues' What were they and are they still there?

17 years ago and 5 years ago respectively, this article was marked "This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. (June 2008) This article contains promotional content. (March 2020)"

I don't see any talk about it since. In what way does the style not match the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia? What is the promotional content?

Shall I just delete this warning or does anyone want to talk about it? Amble123 (talk) 00:53, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see that the author of the 2005 'cleanup tone' message User:RHaworth has sadly passed away. I note that it was was the 3rd edit and there have been a few hundred since then so it is probably fair to assume the tone has changed, a lot. ~~ Amble123 (talk) 19:28, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Have now asked User_talk:MarioGom whether they want to keep the warning. Looking at the article I assume the promotion is of the scheme itself as I can't identify any 3rd party promo. Amble123 (talk) 19:44, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK I haven't heard back from the original posters, it was all a long time ago, I think the article has changed so much that the issues no longer apply. So i have removed the warning from the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amble123 (talk • contribs) 11:05, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]