Jump to content

Talk:Minecraft

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Former good articleMinecraft was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 25, 2010Articles for deletionKept
October 7, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
January 15, 2013Good article nomineeListed
August 26, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
August 26, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 4, 2018Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 18, 2025.
Current status: Delisted good article

American English?

@DiamondCat22 could I get some clarity on why we should be using American English for a Swedish video game? LaffyTaffer💬(she/they) 16:59, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adding game drop updates to the update list

A user @DasKlose added the "game drops" to the update list. These have been reverted by @NegativeMP1. I'm starting a section on the talk page, as I believe the original edit should stand and the game drop updates should be included - otherwise it appears as though Minecraft's development stopped in 2024.

There's a meaningful difference between these drop updates and for example 1.16.2, because Mojang are naming these updates, and are treating them as the successor to the previous system. Including four updates a year isn't too unusual either - in 2012 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4 were all released. Eastwood Park and strabane (talk) 14:02, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Game drops are not documented in the article at present at all (so to add this timeline at all would not be due) and they simply aren't "major" releases of the game. I also recall them saying that game drops were not replacing previous updates entirely, so I don't think it's a "successor". Only major releases of the game should be included in the article. Although I will concede that maybe when the YEAR.UPDATE (e.g. 26.1) change happens then we could start including updates from that point on since there would be no way to differentiate.
And, if someone looks at the article and automatically assumes that "Minecraft's development stopped in 2024" just because minor, mostly insignificant updates aren't included on a supplementary template, then they should probably try reading the rest of the article. Working off of that, you could make an argument that including minor updates would make the average reader assumed that development of the game slowed down. λ NegativeMP1 18:20, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]