Jump to content

Talk:Minecraft

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Former good articleMinecraft was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 25, 2010Articles for deletionKept
October 7, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
January 15, 2013Good article nomineeListed
August 26, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
August 26, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 4, 2018Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Redstone (Minecraft) § Destination of the redirect. -- Joy (talk) 21:57, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Problem is there's lots of fictional materials in Minecraft. Unless someone wants to start filling up that list with froglight, nether quarts, end stone, etc. then there's no point in randomly picking redstone and netherite as something special. Actually adding all these minecraft materials would just run into cruft issues. So in as much as redirects are needed, they should come here. But I think it's fair to say that people looking for detailed information about a particular block aren't turning to Wikipedia as their primary source. GMGtalk 14:03, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@GreenMeansGo well, the reason I noticed this is because the clickstreams for 'redstone' show a fair few readers each month go there and proceed to Minecraft (August about 142, July ~86, June ~106, May ~96, April ~108, March ~74). It is consistently the largest single contingent of readers there. So giving these readers a coherent destination would probably be helpful. --Joy (talk) 15:23, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect AlphaVer has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 16 § AlphaVer until a consensus is reached. Thepharoah17 (talk) 23:20, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect MINE CRAFT has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 25 § 'MINE CRAFT' redirects until a consensus is reached. User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 06:18, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a requested move on the page Development of Minecraft: Java Edition, but the discussion died after two days with little result. It's been relisted once in 20 September, but nothing else happened. Please participate so a verdict can be reached. Thanks in advance. Dabmasterars [RU/COM] (talk/contribs) 12:04, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]