Talk:Manhattan Project feed materials program

Manhattan Project feed materials program is currently a Warfare good article nominee. Nominated by Hawkeye7 (discuss) at 11:11, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / British / Canadian / European / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	Canadian military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

History of Science High‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Colorado / History High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as High-importance).

Science Policy High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 20:44, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Gilbert Labine examines uranium ore at the Eldorado Mine

... that the Manhattan Project feed materials program used uranium ore from a mine near the Arctic Circle in Canada (pictured)? Source: https://www.cbc.ca/documentaries/how-canada-supplied-uranium-for-the-manhattan-project-1.7402051
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Jarrad Searby

Moved to mainspace by Hawkeye7 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 442 past nominations.

Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:10, 9 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]

This impressive article, moved to mainspace on 7 March, is new enough, long enough, well-sourced, and presentable. QPQ done. No copyvio issues. The hook is interesting, in the body, cited, and the citation checks out. The image is very nice and legible at low resolution. @Hawkeye7: could you clarify why the photo is the public domain in the US? Tenpop421 (talk) 17:49, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It is in the public domain in Canada as it was not subject to Crown copyright, and is a photograph that was created prior to 1949, and the creator died in 1971. In US because first published before 1978 without complying with U.S. copyright formalities. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:25, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Hawkeye7: Jeez Canadian photograph copyright is complex, look at this flowchart. As the photo's copyright in Canada is Creation + 50 years, it would've been in the public domain sometime in the year 1996, so URAA probably doesn't apply (I see you've edited your reply). I'll take your assessment in good faith. Tenpop421 (talk) 19:51, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
According to the flowchart, since it was created in 1936 by a known individual photographer, it entered into the PD in 1986, so URAA would have applied in 1996. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:24, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, I couldn't add 50 to 36. Good to go. Tenpop421 (talk) 21:59, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am quite okay with the hook running without the image. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:11, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have any worries about its PD status Tenpop421 (talk) 00:47, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]