Talk:List of HTTP status codes
Appearance
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of HTTP status codes article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
| This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The content of HTTP 301 was merged into List of HTTP status codes. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Why do some codes have their own article?
[edit]Some of the codes have their own article. Why some? Why not all? What's the criteria for a code getting its own article? IMO it seems silly that any code has its own article. Maybe we should fold all of these code-specific pages into this page. Stevebroshar (talk) 12:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
- For more consistency, for a list item title that was a link, I added a see-also template and made the title normal text. Stevebroshar (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- List-Class List articles
- Unknown-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles
- List-Class Internet articles
- High-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- List-Class Computing articles
- High-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles