Talk:Inside Out 2

Anxiety (Inside Out) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 23 November 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Inside Out 2. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Inside Out 2 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

Film: American / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Animation: American / Films / Computer / Pixar High‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pixar work group (assessed as Top-importance).

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disney High‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Animation / Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Top-importance).
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as High-importance).

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 5 times. The weeks in which this happened:

The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Possible GA

Hi, I saw the article recently, and as it stands, it's pretty good. Although it needs improvements, such as restructuring the "Cast" section to summarize the characters' roles and shorten it. Overall, the article is in very good condition for GA. So I'll contact users @Yovt:, @Movieknower59:, @Chompy Ace:, and @Geraldo Perez: to see what they think. 191.106.0.90 (talk) 18:46, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back after two weeks, and no one has commented on the proposal. I think the article is of sufficient quality to be GA (although I'm anonymous, so I could be wrong). Therefore, I'm asking users @Yovt:, @Movieknower59:, @Chompy Ace:, @Retrosunshine2006:, @And1987: and @Geraldo Perez: again for their thoughts on the idea and whether the article could be considered for GA status. 191.156.235.205 (talk) 21:49, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions describes the process. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:01, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Geraldo Perez: Yes, I know the rules for making an article GA, but I was wondering if anyone could work on it to make it happen. This article is protected and I can't edit it, so I'm asking for your help. 2803:1800:1110:556B:A1C5:44E8:7A96:F850 (talk) 18:28, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Still, I'd like someone to work on this article so it can become GA in the future. So don't worry, I'm not rushing anyone. So, I'm reaching out again to users @Movieknower59:, @Chompy Ace:, @Retrosunshine2006:, @And1987:, and @BarntToust: to see if they can help me. 2803:1800:1112:F32A:F9CE:8701:4819:4944 (talk) 19:28, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back after months and see that no one has shown interest in the proposal. So I'm calling again users @Movieknower59:, @Chompy Ace:, @Retrosunshine2006:, @And1987:, @BarntToust:, @Yovt:, and @Higher Further Faster: to see what they think about the proposal to make the article a GA. 181.33.129.217 (talk) 17:50, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article currently has sufficient information that I believe would qualify it for GA; however only edits with significant contributions can nominate. It would help to add pictures or multimedia like videos or audio samples about the movie. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 18:24, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Yovt: I'd say you can nominate him. You did a great job with The Super Mario Bros. Movie and have also made significant contributions to this article. I've reviewed the article and it's generally good, but I have a small issue with the "Voice Cast" section. The list of actors is very long and should be shortened, as you did in the aforementioned article. Well, let's see what you think about this idea. 181.33.129.217 (talk) 17:19, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, the user hasn't responded as to whether they want to do this or not. So I call @Yovt: again for their answer. 181.33.182.54 (talk) 18:32, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can work on this article within the next few weeks, and why thank you for that mention of the Mario movie. I concur that the voice cast is too long and will work on that now. I appreciate your enthusiasm for working on this article and I encourage you to make an account. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 18:37, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Yovt: I see you haven't made the changes I told you about, so I'll let you know if you're still interested in converting the article to GA. 179.32.127.54 (talk) 19:28, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure sure of course I am, I can work on that too. Now, I do appreciate your eagerness to get this article to GA status, but there is no need to continue pinging editors over this article. You can create an account and work on this at your convenience; I highly encourage you to do so. Regards, 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 19:39, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Yovt: Since it's been a while since you wrote your comment, I'm wondering if you're still interested in the article and would like to make it GA. ~2025-36208-99 (talk) 21:59, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Production Higher-Ups

This News was back like in September 2024 as i aware that Pixar made a higher-ups change on Riley when they originally plan to have her to be bisexual until it was dropped. Any of you all already heard of this? Happiness is Simple (talk) 09:46, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]