Talk:Electronic visual display

Electronics Mid‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article provides a well-funded comprehensive classification of the field of electronic visual displays which is a complex field of technoloy.

Which is the reason this article should be "cleaned up" ???

panjasan (talk) 13:56, 24 October 2008 (UTC)panjasan[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Electronic visual display. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060523001732/http://www.sipix.com/technology/epaper.html to http://www.sipix.com/technology/epaper.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100315092211/http://www.ntera.com/ to http://www.ntera.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:31, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Visual display unit" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Visual display unit and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 8#Visual display unit until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 23:45, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Possible merge candidate (cross-posted here)

See flat-panel display, which I just cross-linked in the lead of both articles.

I'm going to propose this myself, since I'm a tumbleweed. It's far from clear how these two article intend to be dissected, if they remain distinct. Either clarity on this issue, or elimination of the duplication is a desired outcome. — MaxEnt 01:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MaxEnt I'm new to editing yet I think it would be best to rewrite this article, there is more to electric displays than flat panels that this page glosses over, additionally some of the information is outdated Chr0mch (talk) 21:07, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

EVD summary and comparison proposition

The display space has gotten crazy over the past 10 years (it took me couple of hours just to get all of the different variations and I am not even sure if I got them all), so I wanna propose a table that summarizes and compares. It's become a huge industry and huge topic, so I think it would be good to have sth like that. Idk if all columns in the table are relevant or if any important are missing. Not sure if it's even possible to get to that data. But sth should be done. Total noob in the space. So it'd be good if sbd in-the-know decided on the relevant columns (those that show major differences, and appear in reviews) and corrected classification of the technologies on the left. (Maybe two tables are needed - one with rough categorization and other with detailed.) I am quite sure it's not completely correct. First major issue:
Most of the diagrams I've seen of "LED displays" when searching for info about LCD and LED displays show LCD panel. Acc to [1] ( "LED screens are composed of a thin layer of semiconductor material that has been highly distorted (i.e., with impurities inserted to regulate processes). Gallium arsenide, gallium phosphide, gallium arsenide phosphide, and gallium indium nitride may be used as an LED’s semiconductor." - does it fall under liquid crystal definition??; there is also explanation of LCD on that page) that's LED LCD display (other types being CCFL LCD and ELP LCD) and not LED display. But in 90+% sources (written or video) those are called LED screens which seems inaccurate, or maybe LED LCD = LED if those semiconductors in LED displays are liquid crystals. Idk, totally ignorant about the subject.

"Year of first commercial model" in the table below relates to any commercial display, be it TV or PC monitor. Technology qualifies for a place in the table if at least one commercial model was released (doesn't need to have worldwide release).

Type	Subtype	Dynamic range (model)	Max screen size (model)	Max local dimming zones (model)	VRR
e-paper
MIP
Vector display
CRT		e.g. SDR (LG xyz)	e.g. 20" (Samsung xyz)	no or number (model)	yes/no/no but theoretically possible
Rear projection display
Plasma display
LCCS
LCoS
D-ILA
DLP
SXRD
TFT^[1]
TN TFT^[2]
LCD	Active-matrix LCD
	Passive-matrix LCD
	CCFL LCD^[3]
	LED LCD
	ELP LCD
	TN
	VA
	MVA
	IPS
	Nano IPS
LED
	miniLED (blue LEDs)
	QLED / QD-LED
	QNED^[4]
	NanoCell^[5]^[6]
	Neo QLED / miniLED QLED
	miniLED QNED
	RGB Mini LED / RGB LED^[7]^[8]^[9]^[10]
	microLED / μLED
	QD-miniLED^[11]
	ULED / Ultra LED
	POLED^[12]
	pOLED^[13]
	Neo LED^[14]
	Full Array LED
	Edge lit LED^[15]
	Dynamic edge LED^[16]
	Direct lit LED
OLED	LTPO
	AMOLED
	PMOLED
	OLED+
	RGB OLED^[17]
	WOLED
	"standard" OLED
	QD-OLED
	MLA OLED

more to consider:

quantum dot technologies used: quantum dot enhancement film (QDEF and QD on Glass LGP), quantum dot photo emissive / quantum dot color conversion (QDCC), quantum dot electro lumiscent (QDEL) - not sure which technology is meant with Q/QD abbreviations in the terms above
Subpixel layout: RGB, BGR, PenTile, RGBG, and WRGB

REFS

Setenzatsu.2 (talk) 04:25, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://newhavendisplay.com/blog/types-of-lcd/

[2] ttps://newhavendisplay.com/blog/types-of-lcd/

[3] ttps://www.spiceworks.com/tech/hardware/articles/lcd-vs-led/

[4] ttps://screenrant.com/qned-qled-oled-tv-display-explained-comparison/

[5] ttps://screenrant.com/qned-qled-oled-tv-display-explained-comparison/

[6] ttps://www.reliant.co.uk/blog/what-is-a-nanocell-tv-lgs-latest-technology-explained/

[7] ttps://www.wired.com/story/what-is-rgb-led-tv/

[8] ttps://www.techradar.com/televisions/i-saw-hisenses-rgb-mini-led-tv-and-this-vividly-colorful-set-is-the-future-of-tv

[9] ttps://www.techradar.com/televisions/rgb-backlighting-explained

[10] ttps://www.whathifi.com/tv-home-cinema/televisions/ive-seen-sonys-next-gen-rgb-led-tv-in-action-and-i-think-it-could-be-even-better-than-oled

[11] ttps://www.tcl.com/global/en/qd-mini-led-tv

[12] ttps://www.androidpolice.com/amoled-oled-poled-explainer/

[13] ttps://www.androidpolice.com/amoled-oled-poled-explainer/

[14] ttps://www.androidpolice.com/amoled-oled-poled-explainer/

[15] ttps://www.lg.com/us/experience-tvs/edge-lit-vs-full-array

[16] ttps://www.sony.com/electronics/support/articles/00013731

[17] ttps://www.flatpanelshd.com/news.php?subaction=showfull&id=1737375702

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]