Talk:Circuit underutilization

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:

[[Field-programmable gate array#Architecture|architecture of FPGAs]] The anchor (#Architecture) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Flip-flop (electronics)#Setup.2C hold.2C recovery.2C removal times|setup and hold]] The anchor (Setup, hold, recovery, removal times) has been deleted.

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

Suggest removal

"Circuit underutilization" is simply less efficient use of a circuit. That's not deserving of a separate page, otherwise you can add pages for "X underutilization" for almost any X.

The concept is too generic
The concept is inherently subjective (the article makes no attempt at definition)
The current description is unnecessarily limited by omitting the time dimension. (If a micro-processor has 64-bit arithmetic, but in actual use 95% of operations are on 32-bit words, then is the circuit underutilized?)
The first reference doesn't exactly sound like a peer-reviewed scientific article. The second reference doesn't mention utilization (and is rather archaic by the standards of the field).

Bad summary

"physical incomplete utility of semiconductor grade silicon" is not grammatical, and not intelligible without reading the examples. There are several other grammar mistakes.