User talk:Tag-hive-new

Your submission at Articles for creation: Class Saathi (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Class Saathi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:56, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Tag-hive-new! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:56, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Class Saathi (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Class Saathi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 13:31, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Class Saathi (October 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pythoncoder were:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

resubmitted without changes, past decline still stands

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Class Saathi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 19:53, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Class Saathi (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Class Saathi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 13:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 11:16, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi, Can you please share more details on this? We are a very small organization to be able to create any incident. Tag-hive-new (talk) 22:34, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for indicating that this account is shared among multiple people. Each individual should use their own account and passwords must not be shared.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  WaggersTALK 13:58, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tag-hive-new (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, I'd like to respectfully request an unblock of my account, Tag-hive-new. I understand that my edits and comments raised concerns about possible account sharing and promotional editing related to the Draft:Class Saathi page.

My only goal was to present neutral, verifiable information about the educational platform. The draft was written and compiled solely by me, though I had someone briefly review it for language clarity. There was no promotional intent behind the edits. I now understand that my earlier phrasing, such as "our content team," gave the wrong impression that this account represents a group. I confirm that only I have ever operated this account.

I've reviewed Wikipedia's policies on conflict of interest, neutrality, and account use, and I'll make sure any future drafts I create follow those policies carefully. I also plan to remove the “Evaluation and independent studies” section from the draft, as I now recognize it could appear promotional.

I apologize for the misunderstanding and truly appreciate the administrators’ work in maintaining Wikipedia’s standards. I hope you’ll consider unblocking my account so I can contribute responsibly and in line with Wikipedia’s guidelines.

Thank you, — Tag-hive-new

Decline reason:

This raises other questions about your relationship with this platform. Please review conflict of interest and paid editing(which includes employment, either directly or as a contractor/agent). Wikipedia is not a place for organizations to tell about themselves and what they do; that is considered promotional here, you don't have to be actively soliciting customers or selling something. Our articles are typically written by independent editors wholly unconnected with the topic, and they summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the topic, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of notability, like a notable company. The vast majority of companies do not merit articles(even some that may have them and we just haven't removed yet). You're not going to be unblocked to, in the short term, edit about your platform. If that is your only goal here, this is the end of the road. If you want to edit about other topics for which you have no conflict of interest, please tell what those might be- once you have a good edit history showing your understanding of relevant policies, you may later be permitted to indirectly contribute about your platform, but not now. 331dot (talk) 10:15, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.