Help talk:CS1 errors
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Help:CS1_errors was copied or moved into incubator:Wp/nod/Citation/CS1/Help:CS1_errors. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Index
|
||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 6 sections are present. |
Anonymous authors
[edit]Using |author1=Anonymous
generates an error message which directs editors to Help:CS1 errors#generic name. That section says to "use a more appropriate parameter", but does not say which, much less give an example.
Which parameter would be appropriate? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @Pigsonthewing, Just stalking by this talk page and found your query. In this case i would suggest you to not to use
|author1=Anonymous
as it is not an actual name of any author. just leave that parameter blank. However, In any scenario regarding authors name conflicting with generic names, useIt wouldn't produce any error messages.––kemel49(connect)(contri) 01:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC){{Cite web |author1=((name))<!--Dual parentheses around-->}}
How to find "Script warning: One or more {{cite journal}} templates have maintenance messages;" errors
[edit]I'm editing Atomic clock which at the moment has 212 references. Before saving my edits, I preview the article and the above message is displayed. I know such nits are common and may be preexisting and not in anything I added. The question is "which one of the 212 references needs fixing?"
To see it yourself, start at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atomic_clock&action=edit&oldid=1241897325 and hit "Show preview".
I suppose best would be an #anchor that was linked to directly. Second, a pattern I could search for. But "warning", "maintenance", "template", "{{cite" and "help" all fail to turn up anything.
Then there's the "messages may be hidden" postamble. Does that mean hidden in the public rendered version (reasonable for minor things), or hidden in the preview I'm looking at this instant? The latter seems stupid and useless. Editing and reloading custom CSS styles is a giant PITA that risks losing my in-progress Wikipedia edits.
After much effort, I asked the browser for an unstyled render and found appended to reference #4 ("First accuracy evaluation of NIST-F2" the text " {{cite journal}}
: Empty citation (help): CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of June 2024 (link)". It turned out someone omitted the final digit 4 from the doi:10.1088/0026-1394/51/3/174.
An easy fix, made infuriating by the difficulty of finding the freaking error message. It should not require such an epic struggle.
There really should be a clickable link, or a documented searchable text string (like "CS1 maint:") to enable an editor to easily find the offending citation template. 97.102.205.224 (talk) 09:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- I clicked and looked, before I realized you found it, and you know the search string now. The doc pages of templates are open to editing by all, and you are welcome to add appropriate text to the doc page of the type you suggest to aid other editors in finding the problem more quickly than you were able to, and it would be appreciated. Mathglot (talk) 10:34, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Mathglot: I can propose an
{{edit semi-protected}}
for the documentation, but the way I did it depends on my using Firefox; other browsers don't haveView > Page Style > No Style
menu options in the base browser. You need to enable developer extensions, add a plug-in, or enter some esoteric javascript incantation. (I think viewing the HTML source and searching that would work, but it's pretty cluttered and hard to read.) 97.102.205.224 (talk) 12:33, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Mathglot: I can propose an
- First this is not an error, this is a maintenance message. This is hidden by default because broken DOIs are common and do not usually required any action from the reader or most editors (bots handle this usually). That's why it's flagged as maintenance, and not error.
- Second, there is a searchable string, and that searchable string is indeed "CS1: maint". If you followed the help link in the preview message, you'd know this. To enable it, you must be a logged in editor with a custom .css file in your userspace. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Headbomb: Um, you'll find the string is actually "CS1 maint:" (notice the location of the colon). Second, that information does not appear anywhere on the linked help page. Please go and search yourself if you doubt me! You can find mention of Category:CS1 maint: archived copy as title, but that's not described as text that appears in the maintenance message.
- Seriously, "If you... you'd know this" comes across as pretty impatient, and it's not justified. Reading the linked help was the first thing I did, and the help page was spectacularly useless; thus my plaint on this, the corresponding talk page.
- I fail to see the point of having the visibility of the header not linked the visibility of the messages, but that's a larger-scale issue; in the short term the confusingness can be mitigated with better documentation. Just for example, "hidden by default" would be much clearer than "may be hidden", as it gives the reader some clue about "depending on what?"
- I'll try to come up with a proposed edit to fix it, it's just going to be pretty involved so I've been putting it off. 97.102.205.224 (talk) 05:50, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
If you click the help link, you are taken to Help:CS1_errors#Controlling_error_message_display, which I will partly reproduce and bold/embiggen here:
- Preview messages
- Error and maintenance messages
By default, Citation Style 1 and Citation Style 2 error messages are visible to all readers and maintenance messages are hidden from all readers.
To display maintenance messages in the rendered article, include the following text in your common CSS page (common.css) or your specific skin's CSS page and (skin.css). (Note to new editors: those CSS pages are specific to you, and control your view of pages, by adding to your user account's CSS code. If you have not yet created such a page, then clicking one of the
.css
links above will yield a page that starts "Wikipedia does not have a user page with this exact name." Click the "Start the User:username/filename page" link, paste the text below, save the page, follow the instructions at the bottom of the new page on bypassing your browser's cache, and finally, in order to see the previously hidden maintenance messages, refresh the page you were editing earlier.).mw-parser-output span.cs1-maint {display: inline;} /* display Citation Style 1 maintenance messages */After (error and/maintenance) messages are displayed, it might still not be easy to find them in a large article with a lot of citations. Messages can then be found by searching (with Ctrl-F) for "(help)" or "cs1".
Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 11:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Check |url=
value suggestion
[edit]The suggested IDN Conversion Tool Verisign at #Check |url=
= value has a limitation as mentioned Only enter the domain in the tool and not the full url
. But i found another site where it is more convenient and it support for whole url, also that site has other features like url encoding/percent encoding etc. (non-promotional) punycoder. So might add that their instead of Verisign.––kemel49(connect)(contri) 17:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
External link in |<param>= when page title really does contain a URL
[edit]What's the correct recourse for the 'External link in |<param>=' warning when citing a page whose title contains a URL for whatever reason. Is the intention that the URL be omitted or that the warning remain and generate noise?. The current suggestions are only to move the URL to a different tag (e.g. where the editor has placed it in the title field in error). DDFoster96 (talk) 21:34, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- It this a hypothetical or have you got a real-life issue? Link to it so we can all know what it is you're talking about?
- —Trappist the monk (talk) 21:48, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 19 February 2025
[edit]![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The wikipedia interface to edit CSS files has the following warning when using the suggested message display snippet:
Warning: Element (span.cs1-maint) is overqualified, just use .cs1-maint without element name.
Change span.cs1-maint
to .cs1-maint
Change span.cs1-hidden-error
to .cs1-hidden-error
JamesLear314 (talk) 06:40, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Done ~ Rusty meow ~ 19:34, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- @JamesLear314 and Rusty Cat: The new version without
span
fails to display the messages for me on Drosophila connectome in all three tested browsers so I'm reverting the edit. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:14, 27 February 2025 (UTC)- @PrimeHunter: It does not display indeed. Personally, I use
.mw-parser-output .cs1-maint, /* display Citation Style 1 maintenance messages */ .mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-error, /* display hidden Citation Style 1 error messages */ .mw-parser-output .harv-error { /* display Module:Footnotes errors */ display: inline !important; }
- and it works fine (albeit with a warning about using
!important
), but if I remove!important
the messages do not show. ~ Rusty meow ~ 00:14, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- @JamesLear314 and Rusty Cat: The new version without
Last name error
[edit]I'm seeing an error message because an author has the last name of bureau:
- Davies, Roger L.; Kuntschner, Harald; Emsellem, Eric; Bacon, R.; Bureau, M.; Carollo, C. Marcella; Copin, Y.; Miller, Bryan W.; Monnet, G.; Peletier, Reynier F.; Verolme, E. K.; de Zeeuw, P. Tim (February 2001). "Galaxy Mapping with the SAURON Integral-Field Spectrograph: The Star Formation History of NGC 4365". The Astrophysical Journal. 548 (1): L33 – L36. arXiv:astro-ph/0011254. Bibcode:2001ApJ...548L..33D. doi:10.1086/318930.
{{cite journal}}
:|last5=
has generic name (help)
Is there a work-around? – Praemonitus (talk) 16:19, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
|last5=((Bureau))
– Help:Citation Style 1 § Accept-this-as-written markup- —Trappist the monk (talk) 16:23, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oh okay. I just found I could use a Unicode character to remediate it, but your approach is probably more kosher. Thanks. Praemonitus (talk) 16:28, 14 March 2025 (UTC)