This file is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Presidents of the United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Presidents of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Presidents of the United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject Presidents of the United StatesTemplate:WikiProject Presidents of the United StatesUnited States Presidents
I'm not opposed. In my mind "salute" was perfectly neutral, but I guess American salutes typically begin at the forehead so it's not exactly clear what he's doing. If you want to move it then go ahead. – MW(t•c)00:25, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
While I think the use of the file is justified, I think the WP:NFCC#8 (video is necessary in order for readers to decide whether or not they believe those comparisons are justified.) sounds a bit wishy-washy. I don't think we're including the file so people can "make up their own mind" (where not a news service). Where including it, surely, because the motion is helpful in understanding the text of the article. Or perhaps I'm overthinking it? Cakelot1 ☞️ talk15:20, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's a fair point. I'm not really sure what the best way to phrase it would be but feel free to change that paragraph to something more encyclopedic. – MW(t•c)23:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]