Draft talk:Real-time Adversarial Intelligence and Decision-making

References with citations counts

The latest draft was declined by Theroadislong 17 days ago.

with this comment: I am not seeing particularly significant citation counts from the sample check I have done of random references. Those cast notability into question. I'm not keen of a citation that leads to the pdf of a thesis rather than the journal it was published in. My view is that needs better referencing. Please do not confuse this with more referencing. We always prefer quality to quantity 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 15:56, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

I accept the criticism of my using a citation that leads to the pdf of a thesis. I removed that citation.

Instead, I added 4 new citations that have appreciable number of citations (I used scholar.google for the citation counts). Now, the list of citations includes a total of 9 papers with citation counts ranging from 14 to 110. These are fairly respectable numbers for AI and CS technical papers. I show the list of papers along with the counts, below.

Let me add that one of the citations is a paper by Fikes and Garvey, “Knowledge Representation and Reasoning — A History of DARPA Leadership,” which was an invited review of DARPA programs in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning in highly respected AI Magzaine. This review of DARPA’s history of AI-oriented programs stated the following about the topic of the proposed article: ”Real-Time Adversarial Intelligence and Decision-making, started in 2004, was the first program to explicitly model and reason about an adversary’s objectives, intent, and plans.“ I.e., they highlighted this program a key AI program in DARPA’s history, and the first one with adversarial reasoning.

Papers with citation counts:

Schubert et al, “Artificial Intelligence for Decision Support in Command and Control Systems” – 65 citations.

Kott et al, "Hypothesis-driven information fusion in adversarial, deceptive environments" – 29 citations

Serge et al, “Make it usable: Highlighting the importance of improving the intuitiveness and usability of a computer-based training simulation" – 14 citations

Singer, “Tactical Generals: Leaders, Technology, and the Perils of Battlefield Micromanagement” – 56 citations

Johnson “Delegating strategic decision-making to machines: Dr. Strangelove Redux?” – 83 citations

Van Dyke Parunak et al, “A model of emotions for situated agents” -- 110 citations

McEneaney and Singh, “Robustness against deception” -- 17 citations

Stilman et al, “The primary language of ancient battles” -- 26 citations

Zhang et al, “Application of artificial intelligence in military: from projects view” -- 30 citations Cz13sz17 (talk) 01:17, 26 June 2025 (UTC)