Draft:The predicting brain
![]() | Draft article not currently submitted for review.
This is a draft Articles for creation (AfC) submission. It is not currently pending review. While there are no deadlines, abandoned drafts may be deleted after six months. To edit the draft click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. To be accepted, a draft should:
It is strongly discouraged to write about yourself, your business or employer. If you do so, you must declare it. Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Last edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) 5 days ago. (Update) |
The Predictive Brain The predictive brain is a contemporary neuroscience model positing that the brain functions primarily as a prediction engine. Rather than passively receiving sensory inputs, the brain actively generates predictions about incoming information and updates its internal models based on the discrepancies between expectations and actual inputs. This framework, often referred to as predictive coding or predictive processing, has significant implications for understanding perception, cognition, emotion, and consciousness.
Overview At the core of the predictive brain theory is the idea that the brain continuously constructs and updates a hierarchical model of the environment. This model predicts sensory inputs at various levels of abstraction. When actual sensory input deviates from these predictions, the resulting prediction errors are used to refine the brain's internal model, enhancing future predictions. This process is thought to occur across multiple neural hierarchies, from low-level sensory areas to high-level cognitive regions.
Historical Background The roots of predictive processing can be traced back to the 19th-century ideas of Hermann von Helmholtz, who proposed that perception involves unconscious inferences. In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, these ideas were formalized into computational models. Notably, Rao and Ballard (1999) introduced a hierarchical predictive coding model for the visual cortex, suggesting that higher cortical areas send predictions to lower areas, which in turn send back prediction errors. Karl Friston further developed these concepts into the Free Energy Principle, proposing that the brain minimizes a quantity called "free energy" to maintain a model of the world that reduces surprise or uncertainty.
Key Concepts Predictive Coding Predictive coding posits that the brain maintains a generative model of the environment to predict sensory inputs. Discrepancies between predicted and actual inputs (prediction errors) are propagated up the hierarchy to update the model. This bidirectional flow—predictions descending and errors ascending—enables efficient information processing.
Free Energy Principle The Free Energy Principle, introduced by Karl Friston, extends predictive coding by framing brain function as the minimization of free energy—a measure of surprise or prediction error. By minimizing free energy, the brain maintains homeostasis and adapts to environmental changes.
Active Inference Active inference is the process by which the brain not only updates its internal models based on sensory inputs but also takes actions to fulfill its predictions. This means that perception and action are intertwined processes aimed at minimizing prediction errors.
Applications Perception In perception, predictive processing explains phenomena such as visual illusions and context-dependent interpretations. For example, the brain's expectations can influence how ambiguous stimuli are perceived, highlighting the top-down nature of sensory processing.
Emotion Lisa Feldman Barrett's Theory of Constructed Emotion aligns with predictive processing by suggesting that emotions are predictions the brain makes based on past experiences and contextual information. Emotions are thus not fixed responses but constructed experiences that help the brain regulate the body's internal state.
Consciousness Anil Seth proposes that consciousness arises from the brain's predictive models of both the external world and the internal bodily states. He describes perception as a "controlled hallucination," where the brain's predictions are so precise that they align closely with sensory inputs, creating a coherent experience of reality.
Criticisms and Debates While the predictive brain framework has gained substantial support, it is not without criticisms. Some scholars argue that the theory is too broad and lacks falsifiability. Others question the empirical evidence supporting the hierarchical nature of predictive coding across all brain areas. Despite these debates, the predictive brain remains a compelling model for understanding complex brain functions.
See Also Free Energy Principle
Bayesian Brain Hypothesis
Active Inference
Theory of Constructed Emotion
References Rao, R.P.N., & Ballard, D.H. (1999). Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nature Neuroscience, 2(1), 79–87.
Friston, K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360(1456), 815–836.
Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138.
Barrett, L.F. (2017). How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Illis
Seth, A. (2014). A predictive processing theory of sensorimotor contingencies: Explaining the puzzle of perceptual presence and its absence in synesthesia. Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(2), 97–118.
Clark, A. (2013). Whatever Next? Predictive Brains, Situated Agents, and the Future of Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204.