Draft:Cybenetics
 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,942 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Certification Ties and Industry Collaboration
| Submission declined on 18 April 2025 by CoconutOctopus (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 20 February 2025 by Theroadislong (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Theroadislong 2 months ago. | |
Cybenetics is a power supply unit (PSU) certification program that evaluates PSUs for both energy efficiency and noise levels. Founded in 2017, Cybenetics was introduced as an alternative to the long-standing 80 PLUS efficiency standard, aiming to provide more accurate and comprehensive testing results.[1][2] Unlike 80 PLUS—which focuses solely on efficiency at a few load points—Cybenetics assesses PSUs across hundreds of load combinations and includes an independent noise certification, addressing several limitations of the older 80 PLUS program.[3][4]
Certification Methodology
[edit]Efficiency (ETA) Rating
[edit]Cybenetics’ efficiency certification is called ETA (η). It measures PSU efficiency under a wide range of conditions. Instead of testing only a few fixed load points like 80 PLUS, Cybenetics samples thousands of load combinations, spanning from very low to full load.[5] From these results, an average overall efficiency is calculated. The ETA rating also includes power factor correction, standby power efficiency (5Vsb), and off-load power draw ("vampire power").[6][5] Each PSU is then assigned a rating based on its average performance.
Originally, Cybenetics used letter-grade ETA levels (A+, A, B, C, D). Later, it adopted more familiar labels: Standard, Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum, Titanium, and a highest-level Diamond rating for exceptional efficiency.[7][8] Cybenetics tests both 115 V and 230 V inputs; the 230 V certification uses slightly stricter thresholds.[9]
Noise (LAMBDA) Rating
[edit]Cybenetics also offers a LAMBDA noise certification. It measures the PSU's noise output in decibels (dB[A]) across all loads using professional acoustic equipment.[10] PSUs are then categorized into one of seven classes: A++, A+, A, B, C, D, or E, with A++ indicating the quietest operation and E the loudest.[8]
This rating allows consumers to compare noise levels—something 80 PLUS does not evaluate.[11] Manufacturers often include both ETA and LAMBDA badges on packaging.[11]
Comparison to 80 PLUS
[edit]Cybenetics differs from 80 PLUS in several ways. 80 PLUS tests only a few fixed load points under ideal lab conditions (typically 20%, 50%, 100%), whereas Cybenetics measures performance across a broad range of real-world loads and averages the results.[5][10]
Cybenetics also evaluates power factor, 5Vsb standby rail efficiency, and no-load power draw. 80 PLUS does not.[12] In addition, Cybenetics includes a noise rating (LAMBDA), which is absent from the 80 PLUS system.[8]
While Cybenetics adopts familiar metal-tier names to ease consumer comparison, its methodology is more comprehensive. For example, the Diamond tier introduced by Cybenetics exceeds Titanium-level efficiency and reflects stricter real-world performance standards.[8] Experts and reviewers note that Cybenetics addresses many longstanding criticisms of the 80 PLUS system, including limited data points, outdated thresholds, and lack of acoustic assessment.[11]
Industry Adoption
[edit]By late 2020, over 770 PSU models had been tested and certified by Cybenetics.[12] In 2024, major PSU manufacturer Corsair announced it would abandon 80 PLUS and exclusively adopt Cybenetics for all future power supplies.[8][11] Other companies including MSI, Thermaltake, FSP, and Endorfy have also adopted Cybenetics certifications.[8]
Additionally, Cybenetics is recognized in Intel’s ATX PSU design guide as a valid certification standard alongside 80 PLUS.[8] According to reviews, the dual ETA/LAMBDA system provides consumers with more actionable and transparent PSU performance data.[10]
References
[edit]- ^ Matthew Wilson, "Cybenetics wants more accurate efficiency certification for PSUs and noise ratings," KitGuru, 2 May 2017.
- ^ Nico Schleippmann, "Netzteile: Cybenetics zertifiziert Effizienz und Lautstärke," ComputerBase (in German), 4 May 2017.
- ^ Aris Mpitziopoulos, "Cybenetics Offers New PSU Efficiency Certification," Tom’s Hardware, 3 May 2017.
- ^ Jacob Ridley, "Corsair ditches 80 Plus for PSUs: here are the Cybenetics ratings it'll use instead," PC Gamer, 8 August 2024.
- ^ a b c Aris Mpitziopoulos, "Cybenetics Offers New PSU Efficiency Certification," Tom’s Hardware, 3 May 2017.
- ^ btarunr, "Cybenetics Introduces Easy PSU Efficiency and Noise Badges," TechPowerUp, 30 December 2020.
- ^ E. Fylladitakis, "Corsair Transitions to Cybenetics Certification for Power Supplies," AnandTech, 7 August 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f g Jacob Ridley, "Corsair ditches 80 Plus for PSUs: here are the Cybenetics ratings it'll use instead," PC Gamer, 8 August 2024.
- ^ Aris Mpitziopoulos, "Cybenetics Introduces New 230V Efficiency and Noise Certification Programs," Tom’s Hardware, 29 January 2018.
- ^ a b c João Silva, "Corsair will start using Cybenetics PSU certification," KitGuru, 8 August 2024.
- ^ a b c d E. Fylladitakis, "Corsair Transitions to Cybenetics Certification for Power Supplies," AnandTech, 7 August 2024.
- ^ a b btarunr, "Cybenetics Introduces Easy PSU Efficiency and Noise Badges," TechPowerUp, 30 December 2020.