Draft:Apidog
Submission declined on 30 June 2025 by Theroadislong (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 30 June 2025 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 5 hours ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 26 June 2025 by Qcne (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Qcne 4 days ago. | |
| Apidog | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Developer(s) | Apidog, Inc. |
| Initial release | August 30, 2022 |
| Stable release | v2.7.18
|
| Operating system | macOS,Windows,Linux,other |
| Platform | Web application, Desktop |
| Type | Software testing |
| License | Proprietary |
| Website | apidog.com |
Apidog is an API management tool developed by Apidog, Inc. It includes features such as API design, specification generation, development, debugging, automated testing, and mock servers.[1] [2]
History
[edit]Apidog was officially launched for public use on August 30, 2022.[3] Initially, Apidog supported only Web (REST) APIs. Over time, it has expanded to accommodate multiple communication protocols, including GraphQL, WebSocket, and gRPC.[4] [5] [6] In March 2025, Apidog introduced Model Context Protocol(MCP) Server and LLMs.txt, allowing integrations between its API platform and external AI tools.[7][8]
Features
[edit]Apidog’s API management capabilities include creating and sharing API specifications, importing and exporting data, using data models (schemas), version control, and documentation sharing.[9][10][11] It also provides support for environments and global variables, and includes a mock server capable of generating customizable mock data across local, cloud, and self-hosted environments.[12] [13]Additionally, users can build test scenarios with multiple steps and assertions to enable automated API testing.[14][15]
Apidog v2.7.18 was released in June 2025. This version introduced AI-powered features that allow users to modify field descriptions and mock data within schemas, and to configure API keys for AI models to enable Apidog’s AI capabilities.[16]
References
[edit]- ^ https://www.g2.com/products/apidog/reviews
- ^ https://www.vector.co.jp/soft/winnt/prog/se525430.html
- ^ https://apidog.com/
- ^ https://apidog.com/api-debugging/
- ^ https://mag.osdn.jp/pr/23/05/12/090011
- ^ https://web.archive.org/web/20230802080346/https://www.sanspo.com/pressrelease/dreamnews/SXTCJ7GJ4RIS5AJ6K6HUYROUOU/
- ^ https://docs.apidog.com/apidog-mcp-server
- ^ https://docs.apidog.com/1097197m0
- ^ https://apidog.com/api-design/
- ^ https://apidog.com/api-doc/
- ^ https://slashdot.org/software/p/Apidog/
- ^ https://apidog.com/api-mocking/
- ^ https://learn.g2.com/postman-alternatives
- ^ https://apidog.com/api-testing/
- ^ https://www.prweb.com/releases/apidog-launches-apidog-europe-a-milestone-for-eu-tailored-api-tools-302012648.html
- ^ https://apidog.canny.io/changelog/
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.