Jump to content

Criticism of bus rapid transit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

S79 SBS bus at Staten Island Mall. The Select Bus Service (SBS) system is sometimes criticized for not meeting the ITDP BRT Standard due to lack of ticket machines and level boarding.

Criticisms of bus rapid transit are numerous, including the argument that light or heavy rail would fit the corridor better, higher operating costs than rail, environmental impact, and some Bus rapid transit (BRT) systems not meeting established standards.[1]

Comparison with rail services

[edit]

The main critique of BRT is its inability to match rail. For example, rail systems generally attract more transit-oriented development because there are fewer barriers to changing or removing a bus service than a rail service.[2] "Because the locations of bus routes are not fixed or permanent, this greatly increases the risk of investing in transit-supportive land-use development", according to a 2002 California Department of Transportation study.[3]

Another argument is that BRT attracts fewer riders and has a lower maximum capacity than light rail. According to Simon Fraser University professor Anthony Perl in the Wall Street Journal, "Rail has a proven record of being able to take people out of their cars; buses don't."[4] Light rail usually has a higher capacity than BRT, making it a "better option" for larger transit systems, such as Bogotá, Colombia, where their first metro line is currently under construction.[5]

Operating costs

[edit]

BRT is also often criticized for its higher operating costs compared to conventional rail. Parametric cost models suggest that, under high-cost scenarios, BRT can have peak operating costs up to 24% higher than similar rail based services.[6] While rail allows a single operator to move high volumes of passengers, BRT requires multiple buses and drivers for the same capacity. According to the Federal Transit Administration, the average useful life of a bus is about 14 years, whereas the useful life of a rail car is 31 years. Which means a bus generally has to be replaced roughly twice as often as a train.[7] Typically, roads need repaving every 10–15 years and major replacement every 30 years, while rails should be replaced every 30 years.[8][9]

Standards non-compliance

[edit]

Some implementations, sometimes described by transit critics as BRT "lite", are viewed as incremental improvements to conventional bus service rather than "full" BRT. The Institute for Transportation and Development Policy has published the BRT Standard in an attempt to improve consistency in terminology.[10]

Due to BRT sharing many characteristics with traditional bus transit, there are fewer barriers to removing expensive or difficult to implement features. This flexibility can result in initial service improvements being gradually scaled back after a route is launched, especially when driven by financial and/or political pressures. This gradual reduction of dedicated transit features is (informally) referred to as "BRT creep" by some North American commentators.[11][12]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "The Silly Argument Over BRT and Rail". The Transport Politic. 25 May 2011. Retrieved 14 April 2026.
  2. ^ Currie, Graham (1 October 2006). "Bus Transit Oriented Development—Strengths and Challenges Relative to Rail". Journal of Public Transportation. 9 (4): 1–21. doi:10.5038/2375-0901.9.4.1. ISSN 1077-291X.
  3. ^ Parker, Terry; McKeever, Mike; Arrington, G. B.; Smith-Heimer, Janet (1 September 2002). "Statewide Transit-Oriented Development Study: Factors for Success in California: Final Report". rosap.ntl.bts.gov. Retrieved 28 April 2026.
  4. ^ Conci, Pilar (22 May 2011). "Bus Rapid Transit, BRT, Catching On". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 28 April 2026.
  5. ^ "ECOPact builds Bogotá's sustainable metro". Holcim - ECOPact. 29 January 2026. Retrieved 29 April 2026.
  6. ^ Bruun, Eric (1 January 2005). "Bus Rapid Transit and Light Rail: Comparing Operating Costs with a Parametric Cost Model". Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1927: 11–21. doi:10.1177/0361198105192700102. Retrieved 24 April 2021.
  7. ^ Useful Life of Transit Buses and Vans (PDF) (Report). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation - Federal Transit Administration. April 2007. FTA VA-26-7229-07.1. Retrieved 29 April 2026.{{cite report}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link) CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  8. ^ Road Lifecycle (Report). City of Canton, Michigan, US. Retrieved 29 April 2026.{{cite report}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  9. ^ "How Often Do Railroad Tracks Need to Be Replaced?". R&S Track. 13 July 2022. Retrieved 29 April 2026.
  10. ^ "The Bus Rapid Transit Standard". Institute for Transportation and Development Policy. 2024. Retrieved 3 April 2026.
  11. ^ Yglesias, Matthew (7 August 2013). "The Menace of BRT Creep". Slate. ISSN 1091-2339. Retrieved 6 November 2025.
  12. ^ Malouff, Dan (9 March 2011). "The problem of BRT creep". The Washington Post. Retrieved 6 March 2013.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Criticism_of_bus_rapid_transit&oldid=1352905219"