Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archive2

Add links
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser
Revision as of 04:59, 21 January 2008 by Creol (talk | changes) (New page: {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archives}} ===Shadelade and 75.63.192.37=== I just blocked 75.63.192.37 for one week (see its contribs to know why). They included an edit on the talk pa...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Shadelade and 75.63.192.37

I just blocked 75.63.192.37 for one week (see its contribs to know why). They included an edit on the talk page of a newly created account User talk:Shadelade. I want this account to be checked against the IP to see if belongs to the same vandal; also all other such accounts should be identified and blocked. - Huji reply 12:24, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - Nothing in common. Also, no accounts associated with the IP. -- Creol(talk) 12:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jackjack and 74.86.0.130

Posted same kind of stuff as Jackjack would. I need confirmation on this. Razorflame 20:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - not related-- Creol(talk) 01:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Drama queen

This newbie account looks similar to an Ashton Kimberly sockpuppet. --§ Snake311 (T + C) 08:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Checkuser data is available for like 3-4 months; I don't have any KA IPs, and therefore cannot tell you whether this is or is ont KA. A checkUser showed nothing we did not already know. And please put new requests at the top of the list. --Eptalon (talk) 09:55, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bobneilbruce and 88.251.54.218

Both seem to be the same person who keeps on vandalising Bono. I need confirmation of this first. Razorflame 20:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done They are indeed. --Eptalon (talk) 20:54, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meatpuppet

IP vandalism from static ? IP immediately followed by account creation and same vandalism phrase from the named accounts --Bärliner 16:07, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done These latter two are indeed from the address given; Please note that the address also features one more user account (Which has not vandalised so far). --Eptalon (talk) 16:20, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
IP blocked 24 hours, vandalism. Names are unacceptable and are blocked indef.--Bärliner 16:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

please run checkuser again, this seems to be the same users as the others. Oysterguitarist 23:07, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Same network; but not same user. --Eptalon (talk) 23:10, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Juan "Encyclopedist" Bracey

Multiple vandalism from user account including same page and same day (Google) as ip which often vandalises--Bärliner 15:23, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - The IP is from a school with a history of vandalism. The IP wasn't on the list, so the page never got tagged as such. No connection to the vandal (although it is very similar to the Italian vandal)-- Creol(talk) 15:35, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Juan "Encyclopedist" Bracey (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) is 100% Angry Italian Dude (talk · contribs)..The so-called Johnny the Vandal..you don't need a CU to figure that out...--Cometstyles 15:39, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Their editing patterns may show similarities; their IP addresses do not, however. AFAICT these two are different. --Eptalon (talk) 16:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iamandrewrice

Ban evasion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barliner (talk • contribs)

I have blocked IP address 89.241.182.161 for 48 hours because he identified to being Ben. --Gwib -(talk)- 23:10, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Still needs confirmation. Razorflame 23:11, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done: All the IPs are definantly IamARs. "Ben is back" is not his although it does have distinct similarity to another vandalism issue (can't say more at this time). -- Creol(talk) 03:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New request. I think that this is another of his ban evasion IP's. Please confirm. Razorflame 21:30, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No need, obvious socks, blocked. Oysterguitarist 21:40, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Same provider, but no edit history yet; never used by him. --Eptalon (talk) 21:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Angry Italian Dude

These user have been harassing current admins and I would like to know if they are the same user and if there are anymore accounts. Oysterguitarist 15:25, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Angry Italian Dude was banned on the test wiki for being a JtV sock. Razorflame 15:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Could be a cross-wiki vandal, Cometstyles might know more about that. Oysterguitarist 15:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
He is a cross-wiki vandal. He's a John the Vandal sock. Razorflame 15:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I blocked The It4lian V4ndal on the test wiki. He is a JtV sock. Razorflame 15:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done The obvious three are related, but seem to be using a large dynamic ISP. The two IPs have no visible connection. -- Creol(talk) 16:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ionas or Ashton Kimberly?

Iamandrewrice (talk · contribs)

The newbie user has been acting quite odd lately, and I think that he may be a sock from Ionas, Ashton Kimberly, or someone else. I know he's already banned from en wiki, but just to be sure that s/he's not a sock. --§ Snake311 (T + C) 20:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iamandrewrice, if you are reading this, please' do not respond to this. Razorflame 20:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done No sign of either/any problems of that nature. -- Creol(talk) 20:41, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iamandrewrice and IuseRosary

Iamandrewrice (talk · contribs) IuseRosary (talk · contribs)

Just a precaution. As per Jeffpw's concerns, I think this warrants a checkuser. Razorflame 21:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iamandrewrice was already given a checkuser. --§ Snake311 (T + C) 21:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I want to know if these two accounts are related to each other. Razorflame 21:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done The accounts are on seperate IPs. IuseRosary matches one of the IP ranges listed under the en: CU as part of the problems. A full check of the IP range showed multiple acts of vandalism (8 vandalisms over 3 pages on 4 seperate days) and no non-vandalizing contributions (with the exception of those today by Rosary). -- Creol(talk) 21:28, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add another username to this. This username is acting suspiciously like Ben. Could you please check?

Alan Liefting (talk · contribs)

Razorflame 22:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done They are definitely not the same. There are several IP ranges involved, which do not overlap. --Eptalon (talk) 23:13, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WHAT?!!!!!!!!! NOT ONLY DO YOU ACCUSE ME OF SOCKPUPPETING IUSEROSARY... BUT NOW, YOU TELL ME IM PROBABLY SOCKPUPPETING THAT GUY AS WELL?????? OMG YOU ACTUALLY HAVE NO TRUST. I FEEL COMPLETELY HURT BY YOUR LACK OF IT, AND NOW UNDERSTAND THAT YOU DON'T TAKE ME SERIOUSLY AS A PERSON OR A USER! OH... AND BY THE WAY, NOT THAT I AM SOCKPUPPETING, BUT IF I WAS, YOUR CHECKUSER WON'T BE ANY HELP ANYWAY, AS THE ORIGINAL CHECKUSER ON ENWIKIPEDIA IDENTIFIED DOZENS OF ACCOUNTS WHICH HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ME AS ME... AND MY IP ADDRESS CHANGES ALL THE TIME, SO THE ACCOUNTS WHICH ARE ME WOULD NOT BE ASSOCIATED... JUST... WHATEVER, I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU DON'T EVEN GIVE ME AN OUNCE OF TRUST Ben(Talk).(Changes) 09:58, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AND WHAT?????? I JUST CHECKED THE GUY'S CONTRIBUTIONS... HOW ON EARTH DO HIS CONTRIBUTIONS RESEMBLE ANYTHING LIKE ME????? Ben(Talk).(Changes) 10:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As a computer science and psychology junkie, I've noted you're presenting the stereotypes of someone worried presumably about being found out. I've encountered things like this before, and your reaction is way to strong. There is a way to prove some things to us, but we're not just going to tell you how to act like you're innocent (to a degree). Cypher (talk) 00:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archive2&oldid=690165"