Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matteo Paz

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Regeneron Science Talent Search#1949–present. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 04:32, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Matteo Paz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Undergrad whose only claim to notability is winning the Regeneron Science Talent Search. By concensus, this does not qualify him for a pass of WP:NACADEMIC, high school awards are excluded. While winning the award has some news writeups, this fails as a single event (WP:BLP1E) without evidence for sustained coverage (WP:SUSTAINED). This is particularly the case since the scientific publication describing the code that won him the award has received no citations according to GScholar; the wider scientific community has so far voted with silence. Ldm1954 (talk) 03:39, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Astronomy. Ldm1954 (talk) 03:39, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Regeneron Science Talent Search#1949–present – As WP:ATD. Svartner (talk) 04:04, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am OK with that. Ldm1954 (talk) 04:24, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Svartner (talk) 04:06, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:15, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as suggested. We shouldn't have articles on teenagers, unless they're clearly notable, for more than a single news event, such as a performing artist. Bearian (talk) 14:04, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as suggested, or delete. Subject is not yet sufficiently notable, but perhaps eventually. Praemonitus (talk) 17:45, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.