Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Library Oriented Architecture

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:09, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Library Oriented Architecture

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, no significant coverage of this concept outside the personal blog of one Michel Triana. I found that his blog post is referenced in a bachelor's thesis [1] (fails WP:SCHOLARSHIP and is not sigcov anyways). Helpful Raccoon (talk) 07:34, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I meant to PROD this but I chose the wrong option. Oh well. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 07:35, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 07:37, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. PaulT2022 (talk) 03:58, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.