Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Git Scheynius

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete, also copied verbatim from IMDB--Ymblanter (talk) 08:24, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Git Scheynius

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a film festival director, based on a single news article and IMDb (which does not count as a reliable source), and which makes no substantive claim that its subject is notable for anything more than existing. There's not very much actual content here, but of what there is, half of it is WP:COATRACKing a promotional description of the festival rather than actually being about the person in any discernible way. Delete unless the article can be rewritten and sourced a lot better than this. Bearcat (talk) 06:24, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of reliable sourcing Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:16, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now and there's no obviously good move target and my searches found nothing to suggest improvement and notability here, here, here and here. SwisterTwister talk 05:38, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of notability. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:31, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.