Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generation Undefined

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted as hoax / vandalism. For the record, while many people consider it courteous to inform the article creator of deletion nominations, it is not obligatory (for example, I usually drop a note for a prod, but not for an AfD). Fram (talk) 07:45, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Generation Undefined

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pure original research. Not a single source (the article itself concedes that there are none) OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:49, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

note: as of the time of my writing this, the original author of the article has NOT been notified of the deletion nom.

the original author was NOT courtesty-notified of the preceding prod either.

Lx 121 (talk) 16:19, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:02, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:02, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the article's own assertion that it is completely unverifiable. WP:NFT. Reso lute 22:33, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not verifiable whatsoever. T C N7JM 00:13, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lx 121's action was an abuse of WP:PROD. The article makes a specific claim of unverifiability. Might qualify as a speedy deletion candidate, to be honest. Mackensen (talk) 03:40, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.