Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avolution

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Goldsztajn (talk) 12:31, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Avolution

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created by a single purpose editor and unreferenced for 17 years. Fails WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 10:56, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Computing, Software, and Australia. LibStar (talk) 10:56, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There seem to be a few companies using this name [1], [2]... I don't think it's the avocado company, I'm not really sure what the company in this article does. I don't see sources. Oaktree b (talk) 12:11, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, per nom. I don't think AfD was needed in this case. TurboSuperA+_(connect) 16:27, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was a declined prod so I think ineligible for speedy. LibStar (talk) 02:24, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no refs in the article and I couldnt find anything other than a few trivial mentions in some tech publications, which leads me to believe there arent any WP:RS out there. This is not the place for free advertising! Dfadden (talk) 02:16, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The article mentions their tool's use in various frameworks, and it has been included in tables such as in the TOGAF article, but these don't demonstrate notability for the company. Searches find a piece about a recent PE investment in the firm [3], but that is connected coverage due to the firm's origin. Overall, I am not seeing evidence of attained notability for the firm. AllyD (talk) 11:41, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NCORP Schützenpanzer (Talk) 17:58, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.