Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Send for Help Group

Send for Help Group

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a bundled nomination of four articles on security companies:

Send for Help Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (parent company)
Guardian24 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Peoplesafe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Skyguard Ltd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

These articles form a promotional walled garden created by Vickypedia22 (talk · contribs) and Realdarrenmark2 (talk · contribs). Although they have a relatively large number of references, none of them satisfy the requirements detailed in the notability guideline for companies. All references are either: dead links; passing mentions; directly or indirectly affiliated with the companies or their partners; unreliable sources such as blogs; or routine coverage specifically disqualified by NCORP, such as merger announcements, "fastest-growing" lists, or non-notable awards. My searches turned up no potentially qualifying sources. – Teratix ₵ 09:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 09:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 09:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 09:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 09:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The bundling of the articles on the parent company and its acquired subsidiary operations may be unwieldy as each should be considered separately, despite their repetition of material about the parent firm. AllyD (talk) 07:54, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Skyguard Ltd: Aside from primary sources and material/refs about the parent company, the article describes this firm's products and several awards which are not inherently notable here. Aside from incidental mention in coverage of a 2010 case, the references are routine listings and my searches are not finding the detailed coverage of Skyguard to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 08:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Guardian24: Aside from primary material and refs about the parent company, the article describes this firm's product accreditations and several awards which are not inherently notable here. Searches are not finding the detailed coverage to demonstrate distinct notability for Guardian24. AllyD (talk) 09:29, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Peoplesafe: Aside from primary sources and material/refs about the parent company, the article describes the accreditations, products and clients for this firm. The references are routine announcements and listings and my searches are not finding the detailed coverage of Peoplesafe to demonstrate notability. (It is worth noting also that recent announcement-based coverage indicates that the parent company is merging the Skyguard and Guardian24 operations under the Peoplesafe name.) AllyD (talk) 09:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]