Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Workforce Software

Workforce Software

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is about a company that lacks depth of coverage and reliability of sourcing that is required to establish notability. The sources presented are either press releases or closely authored, broadly about the topic of workforce management without mentioning the company/product or just contain "workforce software" as phrase, again without being about the company. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 12:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 12:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 12:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:51, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:52, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meets WP:GNG, has in-depth coverage. Gritmem (talk) 20:45, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gritmem: Sourcing is essentially a melange of press-releases or entirely unrelated sources. There is not much "out there" that I could find that would establish WP:CORPDEPTH. Of course, if there are further sources, they may be useful to be considered._pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 03:18, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It has been cited in several magazines and journals such as[1], [2], [3], [4], [5] and more if you search using their tools' names or website url. Gritmem (talk) 08:28, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]