Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Field Guide: Southern Vehicles 2
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Field Guide: Southern Vehicles 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nominated both Field Guide: Southern Vehicles 2 and Field Guide: Northern Vehicles 2, near-identical articles with identical problems: a total lack of notability. One very short review in a niche publication, and that's about it. Searching for more sources produces a handful of fan and forum pages[1], and nothing else. Both games supplements lack the required notability to have an article (separate or combined). Fram (talk) 09:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:00, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:00, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:00, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep if more sources can be found, otherwise merge the reviews into Heavy Gear#Publication history. BOZ (talk) 13:46, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- As an admin, I would hope that you would know that "keep if more sources exist" is quite a useless vote? If the deletion nomination is because of lack of notability, then stating "keep if notable" is not really helpful at all. Yes, as the article creator you probably want it kept, that's a given, but keeping every piece of trivia and adding any minireview in specialized magazines to main articles violates WP:UNDUE and doesn't actually improve Wikipedia. Fram (talk) 08:48, 13 January 2020 (UTC)