Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inside Out Films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. RL0919 (talk) 19:01, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Inside Out Films

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a production company that has had one joint-production, notable documentary. Based on my WP:BEFORE, I cannot find any reliable sources with independant, significant coverage taht shows that the production company is notable.

Of the sources:

1 is an interview which doesn't mention the company, only the founder.
2 & 4 doesn't mention the company, nor the founder.
3 & 12 are repeated and only mentions the founder, not the company
5 & 6 will not let me look at them
7 is a short bio about the founder, no mention of the company
8 & 10 only mentions founder, no mention of the company
9 is a directory listing
11 is the only reference that talks about the company, however it is only two sentences.

Notability is not inherited. The film, Forever Pure, may be notable. The founder, Geoff Arbourne may be notable (I have not done any research into that claim). However, I do not believe Inside Out Films is notable. --Darth Mike^(talk) 15:41, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:50, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.