Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Advertising

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Advertising. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Advertising|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Advertising. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Advertising/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Advertising

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Article deleted by User:Jimfbleak. – bradv🍁 14:36, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Silly Monks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

too promotional and lacks enough coverage to pass wp:gng, a clear case of wp:promo Rooptera (talk) 09:41, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Rooptera (talk) 09:41, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:49, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:49, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per G11. 128.194.3.149 (talk) 10:32, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: this is unambiguous advertising per G11 and I've tagged it accordingly. SITH (talk) 12:51, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 07:53, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brands impact

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one notable source, the other (Economic Times) carries only a listing of the company. No other notable searches available online, doesn't meet WP:CORP TheOneWorkingAccount (talk) 07:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am not agree. i can clearly see other reliable & independent resources. like: ANI News, Business Standard and http://pratigya.info SR4381 (talk) 07:32, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I also added more references that are trusted and liable. Please consider these: Mid-Day, Daily Hunt, and ANI News. SR4381 (talk) 08:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:27, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:27, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:27, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the references are minor announcement of the promotional awards that the firm produces. . The awards are apparently not considered significant, because a notable company in this field would have very much more coverage of them. DGG ( talk ) 18:26, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.