Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prosoft Engineering

Prosoft Engineering

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are mainly primary or promotional, and a lot are the company's own website. My own research finds little but PR, passing mentions of products on software review websites, etc. Thre's a lack of substantial independent coverage of the organisation itself, so fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Hugsyrup (talk) 10:51, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per NCORP. Non-notable company with no significant coverage, the only time they are covered are passing mentions when their products are reviewed, in non-notable reviews and often only one site. --qedk (t 桜 c) 11:11, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - lots of possibly notable products, but no WP:SIGCOV found in my WP:BEFORE. FOARP (talk) 12:43, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]