Talk:Finite element method in structural mechanics

Civil engineering B‑class Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCivil engineering
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology C‑class

	Technology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

iFEM

why not include the inverse the totla amount veriation Finite Element Method iFEM), developed by Tessler and Spangler? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.243.232.3 ([[User talk:149.243.about of thinking limit zoom cntrl all trim 232.3|talk]] • contribs) 09:50, July 11, 2006 nice —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.191.129 (talk) 13:39, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Messy equations

Requires an expert on the subject to sort out the equations. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 08:30, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Poor FEM explanation

As much as this article represents common views of the finite element method by held by many structural engineers in industry, it has several glaring omissions and shows poor understanding of element properties and connectivity. Midside nodes are added to increase DOF for lagrangian shape functions only, not for elements using legendre shape functions. Nodes do not "drag" the element, but only serve to define connectivity. Contrary to popular belief, displacements ARE defined continuously throughout the entire domain, not just the nodes, and the extraction of displacement within an element is not interpolation! Higher order elements are not treated by this article, in which continuous derivatives can be obtained at any point within any element anywhere in the domain without interpolation. The sin of reduced integration is not mentioned, nor its bad side effects. Please see http://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Finite-Element-Analysis-Computational/dp/0470977280/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1312818953&sr=8-2 This needs some serious attention. 209.248.131.3 (talk) 15:56, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]