Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coding Academy

Coding Academy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Coding Academy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

8.Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:N, WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC, WP:CORP, and so forth). No notability. This article has been already deleted from french wikipedia for this reason. Can be redirected toIONIS Education Group. EulerObama (talk) 15:14, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Vandal user. Has been blocked already twice the last two weeks for trying to delete or blank articles he les not like. 80.12.37.135 (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Wrong, not vandalism but disruptiv editing. it's because I didn't do the right thing. Now I do.--EulerObama (talk) 16:28, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Please think about the two times you have been blocked during the last three weeks and change your behavior. Last warning. 80.12.43.194 (talk) 16:40, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk 15:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:05, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:05, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:05, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

• Comment Understand we may have issues with users here ... does this need to be closed even if re-opened ?

These IPs are paid to make things complicated that are not.

See : [1]

In substance, the deletion of this article can be discussed in accordance with point 8 that I mentioned : there is no secondary quality source focused on the subject of the article to demonstrate notoriety.--EulerObama (talk) 17:21, 24 September 2018 (UTC)