Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capella (notation program)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Widefox (talk | contribs) at 15:35, 17 September 2018 (Because you don't understand bludgeoning?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Capella (notation program) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. The article's references aren't reliable sources, and I haven't found any reliable sources. Declined PROD. wumbolo ^^^ 11:41, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a private and completely wrong opinion by user "wumbolo". Why didn't he improve the article instead of pushing for the destruction of knowledge? --L.Willms (talk) 12:16, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —AE (talkcontributions) 11:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —AE (talkcontributions) 11:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. —AE (talkcontributions) 11:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Although this one appears borderline notability, enough sources have been identified and it's improved. WP:BLUDGEON is to be aware of on all these AfDs. Widefox; talk 22:57, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am aware of bludgeoning, and that's why I never reply the same thing. However, maybe you should be also aware of it. wumbolo ^^^ 08:43, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note that "routine" isn't what you think it is. WP:ROUTINE is only for people and events. You've linked it in another software AfD, so it's clear you incorrectly mean that there and here, which does not apply to any of these software AfDs. See WP:BLUDGEON ..sheer volume of comments, such as contradicting every viewpoint that is different from their own. .. . (See also WP:ANI#User:Wumbolo) Widefox; talk 12:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And now you reply again. How is that not bludgeoning? WP:ROUTINE is specifically for events (not even people), but it can be applied when the word routine appears in other policies and guidelines (which is at WP:NCORP among others). And I'm aware of the ANI thread, and can refute each one of your aspersions. wumbolo ^^^ 14:29, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Because you don't understand bludgeoning? I'm bludgeoning on my own !vote now? Do you desire to restrict me commenting on my own !vote?! If by your own words it's "specifically for events", why did you link it [4] for a software/product article when it doesn't apply in your own words? Widefox; talk 15:35, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats. Widefox; talk 22:57, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]