Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 109.185.155.8 (talk) at 09:03, 5 March 2018. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
Category, Sorting, Feed		ShowcaseParticipants
Apply, By subject		Reviewing instructions
Help deskBacklog
drives
June 2025
Shortcuts
Welcome to the Articles for Creation help desk

  • This page is only for questions about article submissions—are you in the right place?
  • Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page.
  • Watch out for scammers! If someone contacts you saying that they can get your draft published for payment, they are trying to scam you. Report such attempts here.
Ask a new question
Please check back often for answers.
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions


February 27

06:51:06, 27 February 2018 review of submission by Subhash budania

SUBHASH BUDANIA 06:51, 27 February 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Subhash budania (talk • contribs)

Hello Subhash budania, what is your question? Your draft was declined because it is totally unsourced. You also do not show any indication of meeting the requirement WP:Notability. Lastly, you appear to be writing about yourself, which is highly inadvisable, see WP:Autobiography for why. MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:29, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

08:48:24, 27 February 2018 Why my page have been declined ? or please suggest me some guidelines how to make this page live. by Itsmngzb

Itsmngzb (talk) 08:48, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

08:58:38, 27 February 2018 review of submission by KathrinAlexa

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:PHOTOTAXIS_(Band)


I have submitted different sources to my article: news, homepages etc. and it was declined --> on the German Wikipedia page it was published without any hesitation. I'm a bit frustrated now, I don't know what other sources to give as a reference.

Thank you for your time and please tell me what to do differently :)

KathrinAlexa (talk) 08:58, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

10:08:55, 27 February 2018 review of submission by Marcrossi70

It has been provided about 15 references, and some of them have full coverage of Mr. Zef Mazi. Also, Mr. Mazi's Albanian version of Wikipedia page exists for some time. Initially, it was said that there are not enough references. Then, in the second submission, the references were added. Therefore, please kindly re-review the page and approve it accordingly. Thank you. Marcrossi70 (talk) 10:08, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

21:12:20, 27 February 2018 review of submission by Jackie845

My article was not accepted. According to the reviewer, it was not adequately supported by reliable sources. According to Wikipedia [guidelines], magazines, journals, mainstream newspapers, and electronic media can be considered as reliable sources. My cited sources include mainstream newspapers (Springfield News-Leader), magazines (417 Magazine, Sports Illustrated), and electronic media (BuzzFeed), in addition to other sources. I can't see how my article is less supported by reliable sources than the one about actor Adam [Best], which has no cited sources at all. Or, for instance, this entry about Robert [B. Shapiro] only includes three sources in total. Yet, my submission was declined.

The reviewer also mentioned that the Adam Best from my submission is not the same person as actor Adam [Best]. That is correct - they are two different people. However, as far as I know, there are many Wikipedia pages dedicated to people with identical names. If that is the main culprit for the rejection of my article, I can specify in parenthesis that this Adam Best is an entrepreneur.

I hope that you can clarify the situation and help me get my article over the finish line. Thank you. Jackie845 (talk) 21:12, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The draft is awaiting another review, but you need to remove all the external links within the text of the article. Some of them can be replaced with internal links. For example, the link to Kansas State University should be to the Wikipedia article (as I did there), not to http://www.k-state.edu. Links to external websites go in the reference where they support statements. It is wrong to repeat them in the body of the article. Dbfirs 16:20, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. Thanks for clarifying. I didn't know about external links. Happy to remove them all and replace with internal where possible. Hope this helps. Looking forward to having it reviewed and approved. Thank you. Jackie845 (talk) 22:04, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You are still doing internal links using "https" as if they were external. I've simplified three internal links for you using double brackets. I'm not a reviewer, so I can't help with the review. Dbfirs 22:49, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

22:23:11, 27 February 2018 review of submission by Reditec

I don't get why they keep saying that I need more references included. There simply aren't many websites that write about that keyboard and I had to watch a couple of videos, read a lot of blogs and fan-run keyboard websites and am now at a point where I can't find much more about the topic than I wrote. I also found a couple of existing articles about Yamaha keyboards that include much less information and still got approved... Reditec (talk) 22:23, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Reditec, the phrase There simply aren't many websites that write about that keyboard pretty much explains why it's hard to have an article about the PS-55.
Our core requirement is WP:Notability, and the 10-second version of the policy is:


So by definition, if not many people are talking about the PS-55 (outside of fansites and blogs), then we don't have anything to base an article on. That's not to say that the PS-55 is a bad keyboard, or that your information isn't useful or true, it's just that it doesn't meet the requirements for Wikipedia. If you want to make sure your findings get put to use, maybe there's a music-focused Wikia you can submit your article to? MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:21, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 28

00:07:06, 28 February 2018 review of submission by Linusado66

Hi, I was just wondering where in the process my article is. It has almost been two months and I have not heard if it has been published or not. Thank you so much.

Linusado66 (talk) 00:07, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

no Declined by Dodger67 as an advertisement. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:55, 1 March 2018 (UTC) [reply]

16:01:28, 28 February 2018 review of submission by Will Harvey


Will Harvey (talk) 16:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC)I'm still not sure what I need to do to publish the piece on Graham Crowley[reply]


March 1

06:52:59, 1 March 2018 review of submission by 123.176.34.17


123.176.34.17 (talk) 06:52, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


I am not trying to create an article about 'Suresh Manickavelu'. It is just a draft. As an Wikipedia user, i have the privilege to create drafts. kindly request you not to delete the Draft:Suresh Manickavelu' Page. I am not creating an article just a draft.

06:55:10, 1 March 2018 review of submission by 123.176.34.17

123.176.34.17 (talk) 06:55, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

06:55:10, 1 March 2018 review of submission by 123.176.34.17

08:13:51, 1 March 2018 review of submission by Danny Agoncillo


I'm drafting an article for publication in Wikipedia. It's about a company called Pacific Santa's Inc. I need help regarding the format of this kind of article, specifically the creation of the information box and the table of contents. How are these done? Danny Agoncillo (talk) 08:13, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Agoncillo (talk) 08:13, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Danny Agoncillo, I see you've figured out the infobox. The table of contents is automatic, it appears as soon at there are four or more properly formatted section headings.
By the way, the notability of a company depends on what outsiders, such as journalists, have published about it. The mere fact that the company exists (or used to exist) and a description of what it does, is not enough for an acceptable article. So please dig through mainstream news, magazines, and similar publications for discussions about the company (but listings and simple mentions are not enough). Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:52, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

18:52:50, 1 March 2018 review of submission by Anic xx

HELLO WORLD! I am a volunteer from the Pillar Project(https://pillarproject.io/) and I am seeking assistance to learn the space and compose a wiki page that will help people learn what the pillar project is all about. Anything to help get the page going would not only be deeply appreciated by me but also would be appreciated by the pillar community as a whole. Thank you in advance! Anic xx (talk) 18:52, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anic xx - Hi Anic, what your draft does is try to advertise the Pillar Project. Wikipedia's not the place for that, so I've tagged it for deletion. KJP1 (talk) 06:39, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

19:58:48, 1 March 2018 review of submission by Mrgmalone1

I am ask to show references but I have no references for I created the name and gave it to my son. I am Gerald Malone the father. I defined the name myself as it was given to my son by me. Because of this the article has been rejected as I understand. How do we fix this issue, there is no further references to provide nor needed as I was the names creator. Mrgmalone1 (talk) 19:58, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mrgmalone1 - Hi Mr Malone, I'm afraid that without references, there can't be an article. Wikipedia's an online encyclopedia, and its articles cover subjects that are Notable. We define something as Notable if it has received "significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject". As there aren't any reliable sources that have written about your son's name, then there can't be an article. Best regards. KJP1 (talk) 06:35, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

23:54:33, 1 March 2018 review of submission by Okeeffemarc

Hello. i have submitted an AFC request via my sandbox to change the current main space article Pat O'Keeffe to reflect my draft.

1. I have a loose COI with the subject.

2. I understand that this process is normally for completely new articles.

3. I have previously submitted COI requests on The articles page.

4. I have been advised that as my COI request is a wholesale replacement of the article (90% of it being new content), it would be best to speak to you guys, as you are used to looking at requests of this scale.

5. I have briefly explained this in the AFC request, but thought it best to back that up with a more detailed explanation here.

6. I hope this is acceptable. Apologies if it is not. I certainly don't want to come across as pushy in any way.

Kind regards,

Okeeffemarc (talk) 23:54, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Okeeffemarc, please see my post on the Talk page of the main Pat O'Keeffe page. The person who suggested AFC I submit was incorrect. AFC's biggest issue is "is this subject Notable?" and since Pat already has an existing page, that issue is long ago resolved. Your Draft is still useful though as a place to keep all your expanded info, but as folks on Talk have mentioned, you do have to go really step-by-step to integrate your content into the existing article. Don't think of it as a hassle, think of it as "peer review"; for each bit you want to add, you want someone else to take a look at it, make sure it's written clearly and has strong sources. And it might be that some parts just aren't up to snuff, but surely others are and will help expand the article. MatthewVanitas (talk) 08:00, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2

03:45:26, 2 March 2018 review of submission by MickeyViolet

Would you please explain why my page has been declined this third time in such a rude manner? The reviewer said I had "stubbornly refused" to pay attention to comments but I have only just started editing Wikipedia and believed I was following earlier advice. MickeyViolet (talk) 03:45, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MickeyViolet - Hi Mickey and welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind but I combined your two queries into one. The three reviewers who earlier declined your draft were pointing out the problems it has. Briefly these are:
  • Notability - to show Notability, you need to show significant coverage from reliable sources independent of the subject;
  • Reliable sources - sources such as the paper's own site aren't independent; sources like Wikipedia can't be used to source itself; Twitter and Alexa analysis can't really support a claim for popularity; YouTube won't do as its content is user-driven;
  • Coverage - quite a few of your sources don't seem to support the claims made; e.g. Source 10 doesn't say Hirst is the political editor; Source 14 doesn't appear to mention IA in Pilger's biography; Source 15 doesn't say Wilson is a contributor; Source 16 (which isn't ok as it's Wikipedia - see above), doesn't seem to mention IA; Source 22 doesn't tell me anything about IA's investigation;
  • Embedded links to external sites - we don't use these in the body of the article, although relevant ones can go in a section at the end;
  • Neutral point of view - It's important the draft offers a Neutral overview of the subject. A unsourced statement like, "Committed to quality investigative journalism" isn't Neutral.
A quick search suggests that there probably is enough coverage to justify an article, but you'll need to address the problems the reviewers identified. If you do this and resubmit, I think you're likely to have an acceptable draft. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 07:12, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for your polite and detailed advice. I will attempt to address these issues and resubmit. MickeyViolet (talk) 10:08, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

07:14:03, 2 March 2018 review of submission by MickeyViolet

Would you please explain why my page has been declined this third time in such a rude manner? The reviewer said I had "stubbornly refused" to pay attention to comments but I have only just started editing Wikipedia and believed I was following earlier advice. MickeyViolet (talk) 07:14, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MickeyViolet - Mickey, not sure why you've posted again, as I've responded above? KJP1 (talk) 07:22, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

14:57:10, 2 March 2018 review of submission by Quibu

Hello! I've been trying to submit an article about the German artist Quint Buchholz but it keeps getting rejected. The last reviewer recommended the following: "Before you submit this again, I strongly suggest that you review the above criteria for notability and gather something like three references that you think hit the sweet spot on that first notability criterion. Ask for an appraisal of just those refs (not the whole submission) at the AfC Help Desk. If you can get the reviewers there to agree that you've passed the notability hurdle, add a pointer to the discussion as a comment at the top of the draft and then resubmit. I believe that should result in an accepted article. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 06:10, 13 August 2017 (UTC)"

So, would you please review the first notability criterion, i.e. "The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors" for artist Quint Buchholz. I would like to note that Buchholz has illustrated and published over 70 books, among them books by Nobel prize winners. Many internationally renowned authors have even written stories specifically about his pictures (BookPictureBook, 1997.) He has received a long list of international awards, among them two Batchelder Awards and NY Times Book awards. Also, there is already a page about him on the German Wikipedia, which shows that Wikipedia reviewers have already acknowledged his notability in the past.

Moreover, these following sources (which are only a small selection) should show that painter and illustrator Quint Buchholz is a notable person of the German and international arts scene who is cited/discussed by colleagues as well as in independent (scholarly) publications:

Heidenreich, Elke. "Im Schutz der Bücher und der Tiere", Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, November 27, 2010 (http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/buecher/rezensionen/belletristik/die-bibel-in-bildern-von-quint-buchholz-im-schutz-der-buecher-und-der-tiere-11071353.html). This is a review of one of Quint Buchholz's own books by renowned German writer and critic Elke Heidenreich, whose book "Nero Corleone - A Cat's Story" Buchholz illustrated in 1997 and which has won numerous awards.

Budeus-Budde, Roswitha, "Quint Buchholz", Sueddeutsche Zeitung, November 4, 2016 (http://www.sueddeutsche.de/kultur/grossformat-quint-buchholz-1.3234785). This is a large article about Buchholz's painting technique in a national German newspaper.

Nodelman, Perry. "Message on a Canvas". NY Times. Retrieved 2 March 2018 (http://www.nytimes.com/books/99/11/21/reviews/991121.21nodelmt.html). This is a 1999 review of Buchholz's book The Collector of moments by Canadian children's literature critic Perry Nodelman for the New York Times.

Dolle-Weinkauff, Bernd: "Postmoderne im deutschsprachigen Bilderbuch: ein Streifzug durch Werke von H.M. Enzensberger / Michael Sowa, Jörg Steiner / Jörg Müller sowie Quint Buchholz." in: LiCus. Journal of Literary Theory and Cultural Studies, 2 (2007), 2, 131-147. This is an independent, academic discussion of Quint Buchholz's relevance for the postmodern picture book.

Franz, Kurt, Kinder- und Jugendliteratur. Ein Lexikon. Corian-Verlag, 2001, p. 312. ISBN 978-3-89048-150-0. This is a dictionary of children's and young adults' literature, where Quint Buchholz is listed and discussed as an illustrator and painter.

Kronthaler, Helmut (ed.), Quint Buchholz. In: Lexikon der Illustration im deutschsprachigen Raum seit 1945. edition text + kritik, Munich, 2009, ISBN 978-3-8691-6191-4. This is another dictionary of German illustrators listing and discussing Quint Buchholz as a notable artist.

Partsch, Susanna, "Quint Buchholz". In: Rosemarie Zacher, Susanna Partsch: Maler des Augenblicks. Wie Monet & Co. die Farbe entdeckten. Berlin Verlag, 2007, ISBN 978-3-8270-5216-2. In this academic publication, Partsch and Zacher dedicate a whole chapter of their booklength discussion of a number of painters (among them Monet) to Quint Buchholz.

Thank you for your time.

Quibu (talk) 14:57, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 3

08:54:45, 3 March 2018 review of submission by 5.100.252.33

Can you guys please revise or rewrite the synopsis for this? 5.100.252.33 (talk) 08:54, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 15:14:14, 3 March 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by MACCAWALES86

Review needed for a Paralympic athlete wiki page.

Please help as i would like to get this live ASAP

Regards,

Daniel


MACCAWALES86 (talk) 15:14, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MACCAWALES86 (talk) 15:14, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

18:47:35, 3 March 2018 review of submission by Bbarmadillo

Hi. Please make suggestions for improving Arctic Zero article. The submission was declined by TeaDrinker. I made a substantial rewrite to the article removing possibly promotional info. I wonder if it enough or not. If not, how can I improve the article further? Disclosure: this article is a (properly stated) COI contribution. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:47, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bbarmadillo - My suggestion is that it doesn't appear on here, which is why I've tagged it for Speedy Deletion. It's straightforward, paid, advertising of the kind we absolutely don't need. KJP1 (talk) 20:42, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
KJP1 please tell how is it different from the articles about other ice cream/dessert brands like Halo Top Creamery or Breyers. Also, do you assume that AP, Reuters and Inc. and Washington Post coverage is paid? I would really appreciate if you tell me how to improve it in the right direction. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:46, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Bbarmadillo - I've told you the right direction - it doesn't belong here. KJP1 (talk) 20:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
KJP1 so the pages for the 2 above mentioned brands should be deleted as well? -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:52, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Bbarmadillo - Wikipedia:Other stuff exists. KJP1 (talk) 21:08, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
KJP1 I know this, thank you. Will you also nominate above mentioned articles for the speedy deletion on the same grounds? -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:14, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The Halo Top Creamery article was extremely promotional I have hacked it back a bit, thanks for bringing it to our notice. Theroadislong (talk) 21:16, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Theroadislong you are welcome. Snickers is another extremely promotional article. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:22, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
But my question remains. I don't see why Halo Top Creamery or Breyers exist and Arctic Zero should not. Technically, Halo Top appeared after Arctic Zero (a younger brand). Also I was not even given time to make edits to edit the article. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:29, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The Halo Top Creamery article also appears to have been an undisclosed paid editing job. Theroadislong (talk) 21:34, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What about all the other ice-cream brands? I am not joking, by the way. Is this category a total promotion? -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:37, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You came here asking for advice. You got it. Having faux debates with paid editors, when in fact we understand each others' positions perfectly well, isn't a productive use of my time. KJP1 (talk) 21:38, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Bbarmadillo, do it then. You're a registered user, go nominate them for deletion if you think they aren't notable. jcc (tea and biscuits) 21:38, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Jcc that would be against my concept of editing Wikipedia. I am an inclusionist. If I see any value in the content, I always try to improve the content or leave the comment at the Talk page with the improvement suggestions. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:46, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:54:04, 3 March 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by FerryBrewery

I have set up a user page for Ferry Brewery but it was denied for no references. I don't understand where you wish me to reference from as it mainly information about the brewery. Please advise how I can fix this for the page to be accepted. Should I reference from our company site, Companies House etc? For the awards should I reference from the Award body? FerryBrewery (talk) 18:54, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are lucky, there is a guide on making article specifically for breweries, check WP:Notability (breweries). The general rule is that you should have every word said supported by independent sources (newspaper publications, industry magazines and so on). Your own website is NOT a trusted source of information (as it belongs to you). This article says more about making references. Also avoid words like "our products", this is an encyclopedia, not your website of Facebook page. Hope it helps. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:10, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can see, the user's blocked and the draft deleted for advertisement. So, I don't think this is likely to progress any time soon. KJP1 (talk) 10:34, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

19:52:08, 3 March 2018 review of submission by Nakulsharma.2001

I'm requesting help because i need to cite a Youtube video Nakulsharma.2001 (talk) 19:52, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

20:40:18, 3 March 2018 review of submission by 68.102.39.189

I Hope This Article is ready to move into the main catgorey 68.102.39.189 (talk) 20:40, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

68.102.39.189 - I think the answer's the same as for the next three. It's just too soon for these drafts to go into main space. As the games don't begin for another six months, the drafts are, of necessity, full of holes. It might be that a reviewer with more experience and expertise in sports will have some suggestions, but I can't see how they can be made suitable before the matches have actually been played. KJP1 (talk) 10:24, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

20:42:26, 3 March 2018 review of submission by 68.102.39.189

Is the article ready because it has two references 68.102.39.189 (talk) 20:42, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

68.102.39.189 - answer as above and as below. KJP1 (talk) 10:25, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

20:45:09, 3 March 2018 review of submission by 68.102.39.189

Can you upload the Mountain West Logo and I Put a reference a couple days ago and I hope this article is ready for main article space 68.102.39.189 (talk) 20:45, 3 March 2018 (UTC) 68.102.39.189 (talk) 20:45, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

68.102.39.189 - As the declining reviewer indicated, I just don't see how this can be Accepted for main space at this time. The first game's not due to be played until August 2018 and, as a consequence, the draft has large blank sections. Sports aren't my bag, and it may be that another reviewer can make some suggestions, but to me, it's too soon. KJP1 (talk) 10:19, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

20:47:24, 3 March 2018 review of submission by 68.102.39.189

I Put 2 References in this article but is it enough to put it in main article space 68.102.39.189 (talk) 20:47, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

68.102.39.189 - Response as above. KJP1 (talk) 10:26, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 4

12:24:03, 4 March 2018 review of submission by 2001:638:508:100:0:0:83AD:11A1

I am Jürgen Kriz. This page exists already (with links to other relevant pages). However: Most people from from not-German-speaking countries are looking/searching for "Juergen Kriz".

Being not familiar (sorry!) with the procedures of WIKIPEDIA, I kindly aks the peoople from "help desk" (THANK YOU !) just to set a link for "Juergen Kriz" to "Jürgen Kriz". THANK YOU SO MUCH.

If you want to contct me, use: kriz(at)uos.de

2001:638:508:100:0:0:83AD:11A1 (talk) 12:24, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Worldbruce (talk) 15:35, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


I just want to say: THANK YOU ! I am very glad that you did it so quick. best, Jürgen (kriz)

(I didn´t find another way to express my thanks, except this "changes" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.182.123.158 (talk) 20:50, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 5

09:03:42, 5 March 2018 review of submission by 109.185.155.8

109.185.155.8 (talk) 09:03, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&oldid=828880403"