Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Spatium apis (talk | contribs) at 04:06, 25 July 2017 (Locked Out of Heaven). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Guild homeHow to copy editTemplatesBarnstarsParticipantsCoordinators
RequestsDrivesBlitzesMailing listNewsletters
Guild of Copy Editors' requests page

On this page, you can request that the Guild of Copy Editors copy-edit specific articles.

Instructions for requesters

To make a request, remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article, then click this button and follow the instructions:

Please remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article to avoid edit conflicts during the copy edit.

Please note:

  • No request by an unregistered editor will be accepted unless the IP has done significant work on the article. Drive-by IP requests already on the list may be declined by any editor.
  • The average waiting time is two or so months. Please be patient and feel free to improve your requested article while you wait.
  • If you plan to nominate the article for good article, A-class or featured article status, please wait until the copy edit is complete before nominating it.
  • Having your article copy edited by our team does not guarantee that the prose will be considered acceptable during any of the above reviews.
  • You may have up to two open requests at any one time. This is enforced so that every request can have a fair chance of being fulfilled within a reasonable period.

Requests may be declined if the article is:


May 2017

Replace "Articlename" above with the title of the article you are requesting. Replace these instructions with your comments. Leave the tildes in place so that your signature is appended to the request. Gmhardesty (talk) 04:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Vansk007 started article but did not complete it.

I'm looking to get this article up to GA quality before nominating it, so can someone help me with writing the summary at the top before the start of the plot? I'm having trouble summarising it all myself, as the article has been very well detailed by myself. Thank you - Metal121 (talk) 23:14, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Working A lot of good editing can happen in ten years. (talk) 02:15, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Requesting a copy-edit of this article before submitting for good article status. Thanks in advance. Punyaboy (talk) 14:54, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Keira1996 23:59, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Need for a thorough copy-edit before submitting for GA or FA nomination. Parmar-ajn (talk) 05:56, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold. This article has had 50+ significant edits over the last ten days. It is not stable enough for copy-editing. Check the article's history periodically to see if it has settled down. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:52, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
For how long? – BroVic (talk) 12:51, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Until it settles down. If it doesn't settle down in the next week or two, we can have a discussion on the Requests talk page about declining this request until the article is stable. See above: Requests may be declined if the article is "unstable, undergoing rapid development, the venue for an ongoing edit war, or otherwise not yet suitable for copy editing." – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:30, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Planning to take to GA. Yeepsi (talk) 13:22, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Working. ɯɐɔ 💬 05:10, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article became GA years ago and it got a lot of new content. Take your time considering its size. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 21:51, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Quae legit (talk) 19:58, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please give this one a brilliant copy edit—improve the prose's flow, word choice, logical quotation style—before I nominate it for GA and later for FA. If possible, please also tweak the grammar of the alts for images. Thanks. Bluesphere 03:37, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Working --Paradoxasauruser (talk) 13:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A thorough copy-editing would be perfect for my future GA/FA nominations.Krish | Talk 15:46, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

B class article with a lot of content. Could use a copyedit. Harizotoh9 (talk) 04:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Seraphim System (talk) 01:10, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to promote this article to FA, and while I believe it is close to standards, I think it still has a few issues that need to be addressed. Consequently, a copy-edit would really make it shine. (Of note, the article was criticized at a previous FAN for being written in an inappropriate—i.e., overly-academic—register, and if a willing copy-editor could 'take it down a notch', I'd be grateful.)--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:16, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tight copy-editing would be perfect for my future FL nomination.Krish | Talk 11:09, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate a thorough copy-edit of this recently created article that I put up for GAN. Thanks. – Brojam (talk) 17:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Pardon me, but I just saw this at WP:GAN#FILM. I think it's best to let a GOCE volunteer finish with the copy edit before nominating it. Bluesphere 15:09, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I nominated it since I've gone through the GAN a couple of times and know it takes time before an article gets reviewed. By the time, it gets picked up for review, the copyedit should be done. - Brojam (talk) 18:04, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I recently created this article on an R&B song. I would greatly appreciate it a c/e. Thank you in advance. Aoba47 (talk) 02:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the grammar before I nominate it for GA. RRD দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 17:10, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article is undergoing a FARC and copy-editing is a part of it.Some citations/info may be added during this timeFORCE RADICAL 10:25, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a GA. However, I recently stumbled upon some viable information that would improve some sections (Background, Reception, and Composition). I'm requesting a copy-editing to make sure everything is up to GA standards, no repetition of information, pauses, and so on as I did my best. Thank You so much. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:54, 11 July 2017 (UTC) Done --Spatium apis (talk) 03:14, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a copy-edit of this article before submitting for good article status. Thanks--Anandmoorti (talk) 04:43, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a thorough copy-edit of this article. Thanks--Anandmoorti (talk) 05:01, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article is in need of in-depth copyediting, especially with its flow, tenses etc. Help would be appreciated. Thanks! AdrianGamer (talk) 12:56, 12 July 2017 (UTC)  Done --Spatium apis (talk) 03:08, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I plan on nominating this article for GA status I would appropriate a quick copy edit :D Thanks and Happy Editing! --Cameron11598 (Talk) 18:53, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article has just been rewritten not too long ago. Please help to give it a good copyedit. Perhaps, it has potential to be nominated for a GA in the future. Thank you very much. TerryAlex (talk) 04:44, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I created this article about a week ago, and I would greatly appreciate a c/e as I would like to leave a solid start for others to hopefully work on and improve in the future. Thank you in advance. Aoba47 (talk) 13:45, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A thorough copy-editing would be perfect for my future GA/FA nominations. Teodan511 (talk) 06:47, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teodan511, you have about 40 edits in 7 years, and have never added more than a sentence or two. I strongly suggest you don't waste editors time with a GA/FA nom on this high-profile and highly-viewed article. No-one who does not have perfect English and a wide-ranging subject knowledge should attempt anything more than minor corrections here. I'm saying the same for Christianity just below. Johnbod (talk) 01:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Created article, could use a copy-edit to polish and strengthen prose for GA nomination. Thanks – jona 16:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will be nominating this article for GA. For references, check out Romance (Luis Miguel album), Segundo Romance, and Romances (Luis Miguel album). Thanks in advance! Erick (talk) 01:11, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a copy-edit of this article before submitting for good article status.--Rainonthesun (talk) 08:22, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rainonthesun, you have about 14 edits in 3 years, and have never added more than a sentence or two. I strongly suggest you don't waste editors time with a GA nom on this high-profile and highly-viewed article. No-one who does not have perfect English and a wide-ranging subject knowledge should attempt anything more than minor corrections here. I'm saying the same for Islam just above. Johnbod (talk) 01:28, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've recently done a great deal of research and improved and expanded the page. Would appreciate a copyedit to improve it further. Thank you ! Sagecandor (talk) 04:55, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

information Note: Will probably survive this AfD. Miniapolis 23:03, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Newly created article on a subregion of South Asia. Thanks in advance. Fez Cap 12 (talk) 13:23, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is one of the first GAs I made so I'm not sure its prose is good. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 15:38, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting copy edit on the article of the film Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines. THanks.NeoBatfreak (talk) 19:12, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting coy edit on the article of the film Terminator Salvation. Again, thanks. NeoBatfreak (talk) 19:14, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I recently expanded the article. Would like a copy-edit before I nominate it at GAN. MWright96 (talk) 12:29, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs a thorough going-over by a copy editor. Thank you.Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 14:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not very long, any help is greatly appreciated. Thank you. Gryffindor (talk) 17:10, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Planning on taking this article to FAC in the near future. It's a very interesting story, a small-scale nuclear reactor used for experiments and now the center of a court case between the university and city government over the preservation of historic buildings. Even though it's been demolished, there is still more content to be worked in. SounderBruce 23:13, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I created this article some years ago and recently expanded so I think it needs better prose. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 14:44, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I hope to get this to GA soon. 1989 06:04, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to bring this article up to FA or at least A-class. Thanks. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 06:35, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a copy edit for this "soon-to-be-nominated-for-Good-article-status" article. Much appreciated! --Another Believer (Talk) 22:35, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Esentially a new article. Would like a review; planning to nominate for DYK Thanks. MB 00:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I intend to submit this for WP:FAR, so it will need great c/e before that. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:51, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a copy-edit of this article before submitting for good article status. Brankestein (talk) 20:44, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]