Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peppercomm

Peppercomm

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I still confirm my specific PROD here which state and shows everything listed here is simply what the company wants to advertise about itself and including what other advertising information other people have published, either to help advertise said company or to republish company words; what has actually now been added are exactly that, and that's not surprising because that's what this company's business is and involves. I still note that the history clearly shows these same advertising intentions and actions. SwisterTwister talk 01:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 01:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:26, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:PROMO on an unremarkable PR agency going about its business. Nothing stands out about this one. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:18, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]