Jump to content

Talk:Engineering design process

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) at 14:40, 5 May 2015 (Archiving 2 discussions to Talk:Engineering design process/Archives/2012. (BOT)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Conceptualization

The conceptualization section is full of vague management-speak words. Are things like word association really an important part of the engineering design process? I would like to clean this up, but am having trouble finding good unbiased sources that are common to all engineering (not just software, for example). Some have 3 steps, 6 steps, or 10 steps, and so don't match up well with this. Nerfer (talk) 15:02, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. The article's title is one that might appear as a module on an engineering course, but the content of that course would vary greatly between lecturers, institutions and curricula. I am not convinced it's a suitable subject for an article at all. Repeated attempts[1][2][3] to link to this article from the lede of Engineering perplex me; they appear promotional. NebY (talk) 09:50, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]