Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PythonIDE

PythonIDE

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ineligible for A7 since it's software, but still this doesn't appear to be notable. A search fails to find any reliable coverage; in fact, most hits I found are false positives. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:54, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is a new editor and there is an article on Habrahabr about it - http://habrahabr.ru/post/249727/. Google or other search engines you might use didn't add it to their indexes yet

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:23, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: not notable. IDE is a generic term used in software to describe any development environment hence all the false positive for "Python IDE". I couldn't find any actual refs for this particular tool except their web site. It looks kind of cool from the site but not wp:notable yet. --MadScientistX11 (talk) 00:37, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:51, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam ^Sing! 10:29, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not notable yet. ☃ Unicodesnowman (talk) 12:15, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]